Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/4534/2026 of Reddy Venkanna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4534/2026 Between: 1. REDDY VENKANNA, S/O.REDDY RAMANNA, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC
APHC010282942026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4534/2026
Between:
1. REDDY VENKANNA, S/O.REDDY RAMANNA, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC
CULTIVATION, R/O.H.NO.2-58, GANGA VARAM VILLAGE AND
MANDAL DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH DRAKSHARARRJA
POLICE STATION, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KGNASEEMA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT FOR THE
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI.
2. SALADI KODANDA RAMUDU, S/O. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43
YEANS,
OCC
CULTIVATION,
R/O.
VELLA
VILLAGE,
RAMA
CHANDRAPURAM
MANDAL,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR
KONASEEMA
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. V Y PRABHUVU
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
The Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), by the petitioner, who is accused, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.62 of 2026 of Draksharama Police Station, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Konaseema District, registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the petitioner herein from the police on the ground that the offence alleged is punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years and prays this Court to direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41A of Cr.P.C.
3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor did not oppose the same and concurred with the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for the reason that the offence alleged is punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years.
4. Heard. Perused the material on record.
5. Since the offence alleged is punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years, this Court directs the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41A of Cr.P.C. (Section 35 of BNSS, 2023)
scrupulously as per the guidelines enunciated in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another1.
6. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date:29.05.2026 ARB
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4534/2026
Date: 29.05.2026
ARB