Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/4522/2026 of Srinivas alias Medapati Srinivas Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 May 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4522/2026 Between: 1. SRINIVAS ALIAS MEDAPATI SRINIVAS, ,S/O. RAMARAJU, AGED

APHC010282842026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4522/2026

Between:

1. SRINIVAS ALIAS MEDAPATI SRINIVAS, ,S/O. RAMARAJU, AGED

ABOUT 39 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.2-92/1, INDIRA GANDHI NAGAROLD

DIARY FARM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

,Rep

by

its

Public

Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order:

The Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), by the petitioner, who is accused No.1, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.68 of 2026 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 112(1), 318(4), 319(2) read with 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (as amended in 2008), and Sections 3 and 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Gaming Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the petitioners herein from the police on the ground that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years and prays this Court to direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41A of Cr.P.C.

3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor did not oppose the same and concurred with the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for the reason that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years.

4. Heard. Perused the material on record.

5. Since the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years, this Court directs the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 41A of Cr.P.C. (Section 35 of BNSS, 2023)

scrupulously as per the guidelines enunciated in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another1.

6. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Date:29.05.2026 ARB

1 (2014) 8 SCC 273

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4522/2026

Date: 29.05.2026

ARB

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead