WP/14811/2026 of Yarramareddy Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 27 May 2026

1. YARRAMAREDDY SANJEEV KUMAR, S/O. KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 1-66/1/RT/B-1602, BLOCK B, RAMKY TOWERS, MINDSPACE ROAD, BESIDE AIG HOSPITAL, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 533328.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI - 522503

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT-521001. VIJAYAWADA CITY- 520010

4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE, VIJAYAWADA - 520010

5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATAMATA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA - 520010.

6. SEERAM JAGADISH, S/O. NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O. D.NO. 56-5-7, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, SATYA SAI RESIDENCY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-520010

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or order or direction more particularly Writ in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of

Respondents No.1 to 6 in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station to settle the civil dispute between Petitioner and 7th Respondent and to consequently direct the Respondents No.1 to 6 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 7th Respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 to 6 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 7th Respondent pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PADALA VENKATA SRIRAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:

The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following main prayer: “…..declaring the action of Respondents Nos.1 to 6 in calling the petitioner to the Police Station to settle the civil dispute between Petitioner and 7th Respondent and consequently, direct the Respondents Nos.1 to 6 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 7th Respondent and to pass…..”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri P.V.Sriram Reddy and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted written instructions stating that, based on a complaint lodged through the Public Grievance Redressal System (PGRS), the petitioner was called for a preliminary enquiry in accordance with the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. A notice under Section 179 of BNSS was also served upon the petitioner directing him to appear before respondent No.6. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner attended before respondent No.6 and cooperated with the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, it was found that the dispute between the petitioner and the complainant is purely civil in nature.

4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.6 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except by following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Date: 28.05.2026 ARB

Date: 28.05.2026

ARB