Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14617/2026 of GORRELA SRIKANTH Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 20 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14617/2026 Between: 1. GORRELA SRIKANTH, S/O. G.SATYANARAYANA, AGE 38 YEARS,
APHC010281762026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3573]
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. GORRELA SRIKANTH, S/O. G.SATYANARAYANA, AGE 38 YEARS, R/O.D-NO.4-2- 188, TADIGADAPA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238.
2. THE
DISTRICT
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
MACHILIPATNAM,KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521002.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN VUYYURU, KRISHNA
DISTRICT, GUNTUR DISTRIT - 521002.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the matter of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the complaint of the petitioner dated 30-04- 2026 requesting to take action against the Mudraboyina Gopala is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the Complaint dated 30-04-2026 of the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the Complaint dated 30-04- 2026 of the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of a complaint submitted to the Superintendent of Police, no action has been taken thereon.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner approached the Police at Vuyyuru Police Station, but they failed to receive the complaint. The petitioner thereafter sent the said complaint by registered post to the Circle Inspector of Police, Vuyyuru, as well as to the Superintendent of Police, and no action has been initiated.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that if the petitioner approaches the concerned jurisdictional Police Station, i.e., Penamaluru Police Station, where the alleged incident is stated to have occurred, the Police will receive the complaint and take appropriate action in accordance with law.
5. Considering the submissions made, the petitioner is permitted to approach the Penamaluru Police Station with the complaint along with relevant material to establish the cognizable offences made out. Upon receipt of such complaint, the Police are directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Dt.21.05.2026 JLV
Dt.21.05.2026 JLV