Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10134/2026 of S HARSHAVARDHAN Vs THE STATE OF AP on 14 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 10134/2026 Between: 1. S HARSHAVARDHAN, S/O MUNI SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
APHC010198302026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. S HARSHAVARDHAN, S/O MUNI SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 39
YEARS, OCCBUSINESS, RESIDING AT D.NO.6-3-233, MANCHALA
STREET, TIRUPATI.517501
2. M.DHARANI,, W/O S.HARSHAVARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
RESIDING
AT
D.NO.6-3-233,
MANCHALA
STREET,
TIRUPATI.517501
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, MTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
HOME,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI
VILLAGE,
AMARAVATHI.522237
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP POLICE HEAD
QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, AMARAVATHI.522020
3. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
TIRUPATI
DISTRICT,
TIRUPATHI.517501
4. THE S H O, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI.517501
5. THE S H O, TIRUCHANOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI.517501
6. ANALA SUREKHA, W/O ANALA SUNIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31
YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.326, AMIGOS PINE TREE
APARTMENTS,
TIMMINAIDUPALEM,
MANGALAM,
TIRUPATI
URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.517507
7. ANALA SUNIL KUMAR, S/O A.NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 38
YEARS. RESIDING AT FLAT NO.326, AMIGOS PINE TREE
APARTMENTS,
TIMMINAIDUPALEM,
MANGALAM,
TIRUPATI
URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.517507
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the day to day affairs of petitioners park and restaurant under the name and style of A2Z Exotic Park and Restaurants being operated from a lawfully leased out land upto an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No. 176/2, Chennayagunta Village Accounts, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Renigunta Sub-District, Tirupathi District previously Chittoor District) and in coercing the petitioner to settle the existing Civil Disputes in respect of the said property that are subjudice before the Honble I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupati vide O.S.No.278 OF
2026 at the behest of respondent Nos.6 and 7 failing which threatening with dire consequences, arrest and implication in false cases is as per se illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, without power of authority and opposed to the Articles 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the day to day affairs of petitioner’s park and restaurant under the name and style of A2Z Exotic Park and Restaurants being operated from a lawfully leased out land upto an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No. 176/2, Chennayagunta Village Accounts, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Renigunta Sub-District, Tirupathi District {previously Chittoor District), pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VMR LEGAL
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the day to day affairs of petitioner's park and restaurant under the name and style of A2Z Exotic Park and Restaurants being operated from a lawfully leased out land upto an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No.176/2, Chennayagunta Village Accounts, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Renigunta Sub-District, Tirupathi District (previously Chittoor District) and in coercing the petitioner to settle the existing Civil Disputes in respect of the said property that are subjudice before the Hon'ble I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupati vide O.S.No.278 OF 2026 at the behest of respondent Nos.6 and 7 failing which threatening with dire consequences, arrest and implication in false cases is as per se illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice, without power of authority and opposed to the Articles 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India…”
2. The brief case of the petitioners is that, inspite of the pending civil litigation in O.S.No.278 of 2026 on the file of I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupathi in respect of the subject land in an extent of Ac.0.40 Cents situated in Survey No.176/2, Chennayagunta Village, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Renigunta Sub-District, Tirupathi District, the Respondent-Police are interfering in the civil matter and are threatening to settle the same. Hence, the present writ petition is filed.
3. The Respondent Nos.4 and 5 have submitted their written instructions, wherein it was stated that they have not interfered in the civil dispute between the Petitioners and unofficial Respondents at any point of time, as the same is purely civil in nature and is pending for adjudication in O.S.No.278 of 2026 on the file of I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupathi.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent-Police not to interfere in the civil dispute and with the life and liberty of the Petitioners, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J
Date: 15.05.2026 chs
Date: 15.05.2026 chs