Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13225/2026 of A REDDAMMA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 13225 OF 2026 Between: 1. A REDDAMMA, W/O. ANANDA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010245992026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3573]
FRIDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. A REDDAMMA, W/O. ANANDA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5/25, TUMMISI ROAD, SHANTIPURAM VILLAGE AND
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 522237
2. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
547001
3. THE
DEPUTY
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT. - 517001
4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANTHIPURAM, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT. 517423
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RALLA BODUGURU, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT. 517423
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction, writ, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 5 in not taking cognizance and registering the case against offenders based on the written complaint of the petitioner dated 23.03.2026 addressed to the Respondents 2 to 5 as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lalithakumari Vs. State of U.P. and further direct the respondents 4 and 5 to register a criminal case against the offenders on the basis of written complaint given by the petitioner and investigate the case and file the charge sheet in the concerned court of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAGHU VEER
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 5 in not taking cognizance and registering the FIR against the offenders on the Complaint of the Petitioner, dated 23.03.2026 as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The grievance of the Petitioner is that pursuant to the complaint made by the Petitioner, dated 23.03.2026, the Respondent/ Police have not been taken any action so far against the offenders.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the Official Respondents placed on record the Written Instructions of Respondent/ Police, wherein it is stated that pursuant to the complaint of the Petitioner, the Respondent/ Police have called both the parties and conducted enquiry in the matter. During enquiry, both parties have voluntarily agreed to settle the matter amicably and expressed their willingness for compromise. Accordingly, statements of both the parties have recorded by the Police and the matter was closed as no further action has been taken.
4. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel on both sides, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 15.05.2026 KK
15.05.2026
KK