Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9753/2026 of Komanaduri Kalyana Venkateswara Swamy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 9753/2026 Between: 1. KOMANADURI KALYANA VENKATESWARA SWAMY, S/O. K.KRISHNA MURTHY,
APHC010187202026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3573]
FRIDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 9753/2026
Between:
1. KOMANADURI
KALYANA
VENKATESWARA
SWAMY,
S/O.
K.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.55-1-6, VIDYA NAGAR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533101
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, BLOCK-2,AP SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, A.P-522228
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.530002
3. THE
ASST
COMMISSIONER
OF
POLICE,
NORTH
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.-530020
4. THE
STATION
HOUSE
OFFICER,
ANANDAPURAM
POLICE
STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P-530052.
5. BHUPATHIRAJU
JOGI
JAGANNADHA
RAJU,
S/O
LATE
BHUPATHIRAJU GOWRI SANKARA RAJU R/O. D.NO.29-108, LALITHA COLONY, DABA GARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM -530020, A.P.
6. BHUPATHIRAJU SEETHARAMA RAJU, S/O LATE BHUPATHIRAJU
GOWRI SANKARA RAJU R/O. D.NO.29-108, LALITHA COLONY, DABA GARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM-530020, A.P.
7. BHUPATHIRAJU VARMA BABU, S/O LATE BHUPATHIRAJU GOWRI
SANKARA RAJU R/O. D.NO.29-108, LALITHA COLONY, DABA
GARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM -530020, A.P.
8. BHUPATHIRAJU SAIKALA, W/O LATE BUPATHIRAJU BUTCHI
VENKATA PADMANABHA RAJU, R/O D.NO.50-117-17/11(9), FLAT
NO. 403, 4TH FLOOR, SRI VIJAYA SAI VIHAR, HILL VIEW LAYOUT, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-
530013.
9. BHUPATHIRAJU VISHNU VARDAN RAJU, S/O LATE BUPATHIRAJU
BUTCHI VENKATA PADMANABHA RAJU, R/O D.NO.50-117- 17/11(9), FLAT NO. 403, 4TH FLOOR, SRI VIJAYA SAI VIHAR, HILL
VIEW
LAYOUT,
SEETHAMMADHARA,
VISAKHAPATNAM,
ANDHRA PRADESH-530013.
10. BHUPATHIRAJU
GOWRI
SHANKAR
RAJU,
S/O
LATE
BUPATHIRAJU BUTCHI VENKATA PADMANABHA RAJU, R/O
D.NO.50-117-17/11(9), FLAT NO. 403, 4TH FLOOR, SRI VIJAYA SAI
VIHAR,
HILL
VIEW
LAYOUT,
SEETHAMMADHARA,
VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-530013.
11. VEMURI BHASKAR RAO, S/O LATE SANYASIRAO R/O. D-NO.2/20, PERASIYAR STREET, NEAR PERENGALATHUR, ALAPAKAM, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU-600063
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 in registering the case against the respondents No.5 to 11 even though the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 4th respondent on 28-03-2026 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to register the case and arrest the respondents No.5 to 11 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to register the case and arrest the Respondents No.5 to 11 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K GANI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeing the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 in registering the case against the respondents No.5 to 11 even though the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 4th respondent on 28-03-2026 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to register the case and arrest the respondents No.5 to 11 and to pass such other order…”
2. As per the instructions submitted by the Station House Officer, Anandapuram, Police Station, Visakhapatnam City dated 12.04.2026, it is stated that pursuant to the complaint given by the petitioner, a preliminary enquiry was conducted and as per the contents of the said complaint, the petition was treated as civil in nature and accordingly, the petitioner was advised to approach the competent Civil Court. It was further stated that the allegations made in the said petition did not disclose any clear prima facie cognizable offence under the penal code.
3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court to work out his remedies. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 15.05.2026 SR
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Writ Petition No: 9753 of 2026 Date: 15.05.2026
SR