Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14124/2026 of K RAVI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 13 May 2026
14124 of 2024 BM,J. APHC010268542026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14124/2026 Between: 1. K RAVI, S/O K.
BM,J.
APHC010268542026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. K RAVI, S/O K. GUMPAYYA, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O. HOUSE NO. 58-14- 95/8, F2, PRATIBHA TOWERS, NEAR PF OFFICE, MARRIPALEM VUDA
LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , STATE OF ANDHRA
PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503
3. THE
COMMISSIONER
OF
POLICE,
VISAKHAPATNAM
CITY,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 530001.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AIRPORT POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 530009
BM,J.
5. S RAITIAKRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
MAJOR, R/O. MARRIPALEM VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM
URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-530009.
6. LANKA ANIL KUMAR, , S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
MAJOR, R/O. MARRIPALEM VUDA LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM
URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-530009.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHETAN PONNURU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
BM,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following prayer: “……pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in not considering, registering or acting upon the complaint dated 23.04.2026 submitted by the petitioner to the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to register the FIR and take appropriate legal action against the unofficial respondents and pass such other order or orders”.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner on record would submit that the Writ Petition was filed against the inaction of the respondent police in not registering the crime pursuant to the complaint. Subsequent to filing of this Writ Petition, the police authorities have registered the crime and investigated into. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. The petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
BM,J.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 14.05.2026 KA/KS
BM,J.
DATED:14.05.2026
KA/KS