Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13291/2026 of Smt.Jaganadham Dera Jyothi Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 13 May 2026
of 2026 BM,J. APHC010249002026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 13291/2026 Between: 1. SMT.JAGANADHAM
BM,J.
APHC010249002026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. SMT.JAGANADHAM DERA JYOTHI, W/O DERA SEKHAR, AGED
ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC ANGANWADI TEACHER, R/O GANDLURU
VILLAGE, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
HOME
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522238.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -516001.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONDAPURAM POLICE STATION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 516001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
BM,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following prayer: “……to issue a Writ Order direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.3 without any authority of law, has been repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and making her sit there for prolonged hours without the registration of any crime, any reason or justification. The said actions are arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 police authorities not to call the petitioner unnecessarily to the police station without following due procedure established by the law and to pass such other orders”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri Sanke Santhosh, learned Counsel, representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 14.05.2026 KA/KS
BM,J.
DATED:14.05.2026
KA/KS