Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14158/2026 of AARUSH BUILDING MATERIAL PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER on 13 May 2026
of 2026 BM,J. APHC010269092026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14158/2026 Between: 1. AARUSH BUILDING
W.P.No.14158 of 2026
BM,J.
APHC010269092026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. AARUSH BUILDING MATERIAL PRIVATE LIMITED, BALUSUPADU
VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT REP BY ITS
DIRECTOR MARRI JAGANNADHAM S/O.SEETHA RAMAIAH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILLAKALLU POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT.
2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JAGGAIAHPET CIRCLE JAGGAIAHPET, NTR DISTRICT.
3. THE
COMMISSIONER
OF
POLICE,
NTR
CBMMISSIONARATE,
VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT,
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
5. KOTHA PUMACHANDRA RAO, S/O.GOVINDA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50
YEARS,
OCC
PROPRIETOR
OF
SRI
MARUTHI
TRANSPORT,
R/O.GARIKAPADU VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT.
JT 2.
...RESPONDENT(S):
W.P.No.14158 of 2026
BM,J.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
W.P.No.14158 of 2026
BM,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following prayer: “……pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the Respondent No.l in registering the FIR in pursuant to the Complaint dated 20.04.2026 made by the Petitioner against the Respondent No.5 and others even inspite of the contents of the complaint clearly disclose the commission of the cognizable offences as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to U/sec. 173(3) of BNSS and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to register the FIR against the Respondent No.5 and others in pursuant to the Complaint dated 20.04.2026 made by the Petitioner and conduct proper investigation in the interest of justice”.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Sazidd, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Writ Petition was filed against the inaction of the respondent police in not registering the crime pursuant to the complaint. Subsequent to filing of this Writ Petition, the police authorities have registered the crime. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. The petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
W.P.No.14158 of 2026 BM,J.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 14.05.2026 KA/KS
W.P.No.14158 of 2026 BM,J.
DATED:14.05.2026
KA/KS
W.P.No.14158 of 2026 BM,J.