Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14050/2026 of BOYA DEALER AYYANNA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 13 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 14050/2026 Between: 1. BOYA DEALER AYYANNA, S/O NINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC
APHC010268332026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14050/2026
Between:
1. BOYA DEALER AYYANNA, S/O NINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 71
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.N0.1-49A, S. LINGAMDINNE
VILLAGE, DEVANAKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518465.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522521.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL - 518002.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHIKONDA RURAL CIRCLE, DEVANA KONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518465.
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVANA KONDA POLICE
STATION DEVANA KONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT -
518465.
5. K E SHEKAR GOUD, S/O K.E. CHINNI VENKATA SWAMY, AGED
ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCCAGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU
VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463
6. K E SRIKANTH GOUD, S/O VENKATA RAMAPPA GOUD, AGED
ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU
VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
BM,J
7. GURRAM MADIREDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
8. EADIGA GOPI GOUD, S/O DASTHAGIRI GOUD, AGED ABOUT 70
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
9. H RAJA RATHNAM, S/O H. BAZARI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC
AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA
MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
10. SHEKAR REDDY, S/O THIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC
AGRICULTURE,
R/O
KOTHA
BOJAPADU
VILLAGE,
GANEGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
11. LADE
KURAVA
BAKASHALA
GOVINDU,
S/O
LADE
VENKATESH.AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O
KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA MANDAL, KURNOOL
DISTRICT - 518463.
12. BOYA DASTHAGIRI, S/O KAVALI DASTAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 40
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
13. UPPARI KARNE LAKSHMANNA, S/O LINGANNA, AGED ABOUT 40
YEARS, OCCAGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
14. ANIL KUMAR REDDY, S/O ESWAR REDDY. AGED ABOUT 35
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDIA MANDAL. KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
15. HARIJANA CHINNI DASTHAGIRI, S/O HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT
50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU
VILLAGE, GANEGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
16. HARIJANA LAKSHMANNA, S/OSUNKANNA, AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTHA BOJAPADU VILLAGE, GANEGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518463.
...RESPONDENT(S):
BM,J
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not registering the petitioners complaint dated 26-02-2026 as FIR or not taking any action against the unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 16 who encroached my land and coming with deadly weapons to threaten us forcibly of my agricultural land to an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in Sy.No.90-1, situated at Machavaram Village, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnool District even the Flonble Fligh Court was passed orders in W.P. No.21729 of 2020 regarding the subject land as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, rights guaranteed to me under article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to register the petitioners complaint 26.02.2026
as FIR against the respondent Nos. 5 to 16 and not to interfere in petitioners land and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the official respondents to register the petitioner’s complaint dt.26.02.2026 as FIR against the respondent Nos. 5 to 16 and not to interfere in petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in Sy.No.90-1, situated at Machavaram Village, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
BM,J
WRIT PETITION NO:14050 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following prayer: “…to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not registering the petitioner’s complaint dated 26-02-2026 as FIR or not taking any action against the unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 16 who encroached my land and coming with deadly weapons to threaten us forcibly of my agricultural land to an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in Sy.No.90-1, situated at Machavaram Village, Devanakonda Mandal, Kurnool District even the Hon’ble High Court was passed orders in W.P. No.21729 of 2020 regarding the subject land as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, rights guaranteed to me under article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to register the petitioner’s complaint 26.02.2026 as FIR against the respondent Nos.5 to 16 and not to interfere in petitioner’s land and pass such other order or orders…”
BM,J
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that subsequent to filing of writ petition, police have registered FIR and that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 14.05.2026 Ksj
BM,J
Writ Petition No:14050 of 2026 14.05.2026
Ksj