Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1497/2018 of NO PETITIONER Vs Smt. Vijaya Krishnan, IAS., on 7 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1497/2018 Between: 1. NO PETITIONER, NO ADDRESS ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN
APHC010457752018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1497/2018
Between:
1. NO PETITIONER, NO ADDRESS
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN IAS, Joint Collector, Krishna District At Machilipatnam.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to By order dated 14/06/2018 passed in W.P. No.,19616 of 2018, this Hon'ble Court while granting interim direction obs4rved that the 2nd respondent therein (Contemnor herein)
could not have directed the petitioner (Dosapati Sai Prakash S/o.
Satyanarayana R/o. Flat No. 301, Limra Apartments, Andhra Patrika Colony, Singh Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District) to give a bank guarantee for releasing the stock, when such a condition was not imposed by the Hon'ble Court in its order dated 06/04/2018 in IA.No. 1 of 2018 in WP.No. 11316 of 2018 and the court directed the Registry to issue show cause notice to the 2nd respondent as to why proceedings for contempt of court shall not be initiated against her for violating the above order i.e., IA.No. 1 of 2018 in WP.No. 11316 of 2018 passed by this Hon'ble Court on 06/04/2018.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Suo Motu Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Rule 5(a) of the Contempt of Court Rules, 1980, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 14.06.2018 passed in W.P.No.19616 of 2018, wherein this Court while granting interim direction observed that the 2nd respondent therein could not have directed the petitioner to give bank guarantee for releasing stock, when such a condition was not imposed by this Court in its order dated 06.04.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.11316 of 2018 and directed the Registry to issue show cause notice to the 2nd respondent/contemnor to explain as to why proceeding for contempt of Court shall not be initiated against her for violating the order dated 06.04.2018.
This Court dismissed the writ petition in W.P.No.19616 of 2018 on 08.05.2026 for non prosecution. As such, nothing remains for adjudication in this contempt case.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 08th May, 2026
RKS