Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13723/2026 of PASUPULATI VSENKATA SATYA SURYA PRAKASH STUDENT Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 13723/2026 Between: Pasupulati Vsenkata Satya Surya Prakash Student
APHC010262242026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 13723/2026
Between:
Pasupulati Vsenkata Satya Surya Prakash Student
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
Writ Petition No:13723 /2026 O R DE R:
The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not releasing financial assistance of Rs.5,00,000/- sanctioned to the son of the Petitioner under ‘Videshi Vidhya Deevena’ scheme for pursuing MEM MBA in abroad, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The facts leading to this case are as follows: The son of the Petitioner had applied for financial assistance under “Videshi Vidhya Deevana’ for pursuing MEM MBA in abroad, vide Application ID No.OV2018117342. After due verification, Respondent No.3 sanctioned Rs.5,00,000/- in favour of the son of the Petitioner for pursuing the said course. Though, the son of the Petitioner had completed his Course, the financial assistance as promised to him was not disbursed. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.
3. Sri C. Venkateswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.3/Corporation submits that the application of the son of the Petitioner would be considered and amounts would be sanctioned, if the son of the Petitioner is within the conditions specified, for release of the amounts.
4. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions:-
(i) The Respondents are directed to examine the claim of the son of the Petitioner within a period of six
(06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) In the event, the claim of the son of the Petitioner is held to be in order, the Respondents are directed to release the amounts to the son of the Petitioner within a further period of eight (08) weeks.
(iii) There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 08.05.2026
eha
W.P.No.13723 of 2026 Dated: 08.05.2026
eha