Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1524/2026 of M/s.UDAY AGRO AND TECHNOLOGY PVT.LTD., Vs NISSANKARARAO VENKATESWARAMMA, on 7 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1524/2026 Between: 1. M/S.UDAY AGRO AND TECHNOLOGY PVT.LTD.,, HYDERABAD REP.
APHC010268482026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1524/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S.UDAY AGRO AND TECHNOLOGY PVT.LTD.,, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR DIGUVA VIKRAM SINGH
...PETITIONER AND
1. NISSANKARARAO VENKATESWARAMMA, W/O.LATE RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.2-83, ETUKURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR CITY - 522017.
2. NISSANKARARAO GOPI, S/O. LATE RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.2-83, ETUKURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR CITY- 522017.
3. DR KONDRAGUNTA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O.VEERA RAGHAVAIAH, HINDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.5-87-94, 2ND LINE, LAKSHMIPURAM, GUNTUR - 522 007
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to a) set aside the docket/order dated 27.04.2026 passed in I.A. No. 193 of 2022 in O.S. No.33 of 2022 on the file of the Court of XII Addl. District Judge, Guntur b) consequently dismiss I.A.193/2022 in O.S.No.33 of 2022 on the file of the Court of XII Addl. District Judge, Guntur in view of the not press memo filed by the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRAVAN KUMAR MANNAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this civil revision petition in order to press his request for withdrawal before the trial court on 22.06.2026.
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date: 08.05.2026 KA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1524/2026
Date: 08.05.2026 KA