Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/3616/2025 of JAJULA AROGYA DAS Vs CHINTALA PHANI KUMAR on 7 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3616/2025 Between: 1. JAJULA AROGYA DAS, , S/O. JAJULA ANTHONY, AGED ABOUT 50

APHC010645142025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3616/2025

Between:

1. JAJULA AROGYA DAS, , S/O. JAJULA ANTHONY, AGED ABOUT 50

YEARS. FLAT NO. 107, SAI RAM SUBHARA APPARATMENT, NEAR

SUBHARA GARDEN, LUCKY APPEAL SCHOOL STREET, SUJATH

NAGAR, PENDURTHI, VISAKAHPATNAM

...PETITIONER

AND

1. CHINTALA PHANI KUMAR, S/O. RAJA BABU, ABOUT 40 YEARS.

DOOR NO. 49- 46-21/A, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM

2. THE FLAG OFFICER, (COMMANDING IN CHEIF EASTERN NAVAL

COMMAND HEADQUARTERS, EASTERN NAVAL COMMAND, VISAKHAPATNAM

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the Order dated 25-02-2025 passed by the learned Principal Civil Judge(Senior Division) at Visakhapatnam in E.P. No. 0

214/2022 in O.S. No. 1328/2015, whereby the objection of the first judgment debtor was overruled and warrant under Section 55 r/w Order 21 Rule37, 38

CPC

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

pleased to condone the delay of 148 days in presenting the revision to this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Stay all further proceedings including Stay the execution of warrant issued under Order 21 Rule 38 CPC for my arrest and detention in E.P. No. 214/2025 in O.S. No. 1328/2015 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge at Visakhapatnam(Senior Division), pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3616 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a Memo, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition.

2. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J

Dated:08.05.2026 KNN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3616 of 2025

Dated:08.05.2026 KNN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead