Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/42340/2022 of B RAMANJANEYULU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 42340/2022 Between: 1. B RAMANJANEYULU, S/O CHITAMBARI, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC.

APHC010718732022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 42340/2022

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. B RAMANJANEYULU, S/O CHITAMBARI, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KANUMAPALLI VILLAGE, GARLADINNE MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT., ANANTAPUR

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTAPUR,ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

5. THE TAHSILDAR, GARLADINEEMANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

6. CHAGANTI NARAYANASWAMY DIED AS PER L RS RR 7 AND 8, S/O CHAGANTI ANJANEYULU, AGE MAJOR, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KANUMPALLI VILLAGE, GARLADINNE MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

7. BILLA BABU S/O BILLA VENKATESU, AGE ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION,

R/O D.NO.1-119, KANUMPALLI VILLAGE, GARLADINNE MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.

8. BILLA NARENDRA S/O BILLA VENKATESU, AGE ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.1-119, KANUMPALLI VILLAGE, GARLADINNE MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. RR 7 AND 8 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.RS OF THE DECEASED 6TH RESPONDENT AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.30.10.2025 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2025.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring order passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings Rc.No.E4/1435/2022 dated 03.11.2022 in dismissing the revision preferred by the petitioner against the orders of 4th respondent in D.Dis No. D2/1132/2017 dated 29.07.2018 by confirming the order in respect of land in Sy.No.155-2 admeasuring Ac.5.09 cents of Kanumapalli Village, Garladinne Mandal, Anantapur District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated direct the respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.155-2 admeasuring Ac.5.09 cents of Kanumapalli Village, Garladinne Mandal, Anantapur District by making changes in revenue records in respect of above said property and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the 3rd respondent in in Rc.No. E4/1435/2022 dated 03.11.2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated vacate the status quo order dated 05.01.2023 in W.P.No.42340 of 2022 also dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the proposed petitioners herein to come on record as Respondents 7 & 8, as legal heirs of Chaganti Narayanaswamy/R6, in WP.No.42340 of 2022, including IA.Nos.1 & 2 of 2022, along with IA.No.1 of 2023, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. K VISWANATHAM The Court made the following Order:

Sri P. Narahari Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter before the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 08-05-2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 42340/2022

Dated: 08-05-2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead