Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/13878/2026 of AKULA PARDHU VENKATA SATYA SAI VARSHITH (STUDENT) Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 7 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 13878/2026 Between: Akula Pardhu Venkata Satya Sai Varshith (student)

APHC010262122026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 13878/2026

Between:

Akula Pardhu Venkata Satya Sai Varshith (student)

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. DEVALARAJU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:

Writ Petition No:13878 /2026 O R DE R:

The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not releasing financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- sanctioned to the son of the Petitioner under ‘Videshi Vidhya Deevena Scheme’ for pursuing MBBS in abroad, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The facts leading to this case are as follows: The son of the Petitioner had applied for financial assistance under ‘Videshi Vidhya Deevena Scheme’ for pursuing MBBS in abroad, vide Application ID No.OV2018120539. After due verification, Respondent No.3 sanctioned Rs.10,00,000/- in favour of the son of the Petitioner for pursuing the said course. Though, the son of the Petitioner had completed his Course, the financial assistance as promised to him was not disbursed. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent No.3/Corporation submits that the application of the son of the Petitioner would be considered and amounts would be sanctioned, if the son of the Petitioner is within the conditions specified, for release of the amounts.

4. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions:-

(i) The Respondents are directed to examine the claim of the son of the Petitioner within a period of six

(06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(ii) In the event, the claim of the son of the Petitioner is held to be in order, the Respondents are directed to release the amounts to the son of the Petitioner within a further period of eight (08) weeks.

(iii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 08.05.2026

eha

W.P.No.13878 of 2026 Dated: 08.05.2026

eha

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead