CC/4095/2024 of KANCHIRAJU KASINATH Vs B.S. GIRI KUMAR on 7 May 2026

1. KANCHIRAJU KAS AGE 63 YEARS, R/ 28, PIDUGURALLA AT DOOR NO.2RT 500057.

1. B S GIRI KUMAR YEARS. THE M MUNCIPALITY, PID

2. IRUVURI SRINIVAS YEARS,

THE MUNICIPALITY, IMPLEDED AS PER 1OF 2025 IN CC NO Petition under Secti that in the circumstances be pleased to may be disobedience of the orde 18.04.2024 and pass

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL NTEMPT CASE NO: 4095/2024 SINATH, S/O. SEETHARAMAYYA, /O. DOOR NO. 4-44/1, MAYA BAZA A, PALNADU DISTRICT., PRESENT T-148, VIJAYANAGAR COLONY, AND , S/O. NOT KNOWN, MALE, AGE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, P DUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT.. SULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, MALE, AG MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, P PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRIC R COURT ORDER DT.07.08.2025. O. 4095 OF 2024. ...CO ons 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts A s stated in the affidavit file herein the e pleased to punish the Contemno er of this Honble Court in W.P.No.33 DESH

LAPATI HINDU MALE, AR, WARD NO. TLY RESIDING HYDERABAD- ...PETITIONER ED ABOUT 54 PIDUGURALLA

GED ABOUR 50 PIDUGARALLA CT. R 2 IS VIDE I.A. NO. ONTEMNOR(S): Act 1971 praying High Court may or for his willful 3358 of 2023 Dt.

IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed contemnor as the 2nd Contemnor in the present contempt case and in other miscellaneous applications in the interests of the justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the 2nd Respondent for further hearings, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, Standing Counsel For Municipalities

The Court made the following order:

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 18.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.33358 of 2023.

2. Heard Sri Mangena Sree Ramarao, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.2.

3. Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that pursuant to the filing of the Contempt Case, the authorities have removed the encroachments, and therefore, it amounts to compliance with the order of this Court dated 18.04.2024 in Writ Petition No.33358 of 2023. However, the petitioner apprehends that after closure of the Contempt Case, the authorities may again permit encroachments, accordingly prayed to pass appropriate orders.

4. Since the respondent authorities have removed the encroachments, even according to the petitioner, there is nothing survives for further adjudication and the Contempt Case is liable to be closed. The contention advanced by the petitioner is mere apprehension and such apprehension cannot be taken note of by this Court, as apprehensions alone are not sufficient for adjudication.

6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 08.05.2026 MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO:4095 of 2024 Date: 08.05.2026

MP