Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7001/2019 of Smt. Epuri Venkateswaramma, Vs THE STATE OF AP on 7 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7001/2019 Between: 1. SMT. EPURI VENKATESWARAMMA,, WIO VEERENDRA, AGED 33 YEARS, RESIDENT
APHC010161352019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 7001/2019
Between:
1. SMT. EPURI VENKATESWARAMMA,, WIO VEERENDRA, AGED 33
YEARS, RESIDENT OF VAMBAY COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA.
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NUNNA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
4. THE
MUNICIPAL
COMMISSIONER,
VIJAYAWADA,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT
5. THE SUB COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
6. THE JOINT COLLECTORII, KRISHNA AND REVENUE DIVISION
OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
7. THE TAHSILDAR, VIJAYAWADA NORTH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
8. SMT BADE SUJATHA, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO, RESIDENT OF
D.NO.
C2-31,
GROUND
FLOOR
NO.4,
VAMBAY
COLONY,
SINGHNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a Writ, Order or direction more pari-iuuiarly ()Ile -a the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the inaction on the airy of the Respondem no. 3 on the direction given by the Respondent No.5/ The sub- Co.,ector, Vijayawada on 08.05.2019 and the representation given by the Petitioner complaint dated 01.06.2019 filed as per the direction of the Respondent No..5, as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Section 154(3)
of Criminal Procedure Code, Article 14 of Constitution of India and Violation principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent 3 to initiate action against Respondent no. 8 on the complaint lodged by the Petitioner dated 01.06.20 9 before the SHO, Nunna Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to consider the direction given by the Respondent No.5/ The Sub- Collector, Vijayawada on 08.05.2019 and the representation given by the Petitioner complaint dated 01.06.2019 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. PILLIX LAW FIRM
4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION No.7001 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER: -
This writ petition is filed against the inaction of the respondent No.3 in implementing the direction given by the respondent No.5, dated 08.05.2019 on the representation submitted by the petitioner on 01.06.2019, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the complaint of the petitioner, dated 08.05.2019 has been considered and it is referred as civil in nature under a referred notice and the same is informed to the petitioner vide letter, dated 01.05.2026.
3. In view of the same, no further adjudication is required in this case.
4. It is open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps, if he aggrieved against the letter dated 01.05.2026, communicated to the petitioner by the respondent No.5.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 08.05.2026 RMD/SA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO.7001 of 2019
Date: 08.05.2026 RMD/SA