Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/623/2026 of M/s Sri Balaji Transport, Vs ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD(APSCSCL) on 7 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 623 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-17 [3579] M/s. Sri Balaji Transport ...Appellant Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (APSCSCL) and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant: Mr. Ghanta Rama Rao, ld. Senior
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010263582026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT APPEAL NO: 623 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-17
M/s. Sri Balaji Transport ...Appellant Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (APSCSCL) and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant: Mr. Ghanta Rama Rao, ld. Senior Counsel appearing vice Mr. Ghanta Sridhar Advocates for Respondents: Mr. K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, Mr. Md. Saleem, GP for Civil Supplies
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE : 8th May, 2026. LISA GILL, CJ. (Oral)
Learned counsel for appellant has raised various arguments to submit that impugned interlocutory order dated 30.04.2026 should be modified.
2. It is submitted that scope of work allotted to present appellant is different from scope of work allotted to unofficial respondent/writ petitioner. He has referred to the work orders attached with the writ petition.
3. We have heard learned counsel for parties.
HCJ & NJSJ WA_623_2026
4. It is a matter of record and not denied that this appeal has been filed challenging an interlocutory order. Application seeking vacation of this order has also been filed by present appellant and is pending adjudication before learned Single Judge.
5. In this view of the matter, we do not find any ground to cause interference at this stage.
6. Appellant is at liberty to file appropriate application for listing of his application seeking vacating/modification of interim order before the 1st Vacation Court and in case such an application is filed, same be listed for hearing.
7. It is clarified that there is no expression of opinion on merits of the matter.
8. Writ Appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
LISA GILL, CJ.
NINALA JAYASURYA, J. SSN