Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1443/2026 of A GANGADHAR GURUKUL Vs M/S APCO INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED on 6 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1443/2026 Between: 1. A GANGADHAR GURUKUL, S/O LATE A . SUBRAMANYAM GURUKUL,
APHC010233882026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1443/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A GANGADHAR GURUKUL, S/O LATE A. SUBRAMANYAM GURUKUL, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O MOGILI VILLAGE, MOGILI MITTOOR POST, BANGARUPALYEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. M/S APCO INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Mr. Shailesh Kumar Gupta, S/o no known aged about 40 years havingregistered office at B-9, Vibhuti Khand, Gomati Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURE MAHENDRA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. NJS,J CRP No.1443 of 2026
The Court made the following Order:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The grievance ventilated in the present revision petition is that despite filing an application vide I.A No.35 of 2024 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C., the same is being adjourned from time to time, at the behest of respondent and as a result of the same, petitioner/plaintiff is seriously prejudiced to.
3. As seen from the docket proceedings filed along with the revision petition, it would appear that sufficient opportunity was afforded to respondent and in fact, on four occasions i.e., on 30.06.2025, 09.09.2025, 04.11.2025 and 08.01.2026, time for filing counter, as a last chance was granted.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the matter stands posted to 30.06.2026.
5. Considering the submissions made and perusing the material on record, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the revision petition, providing that the learned Special Judicial First Class Magistrate, Excise Court – Cum – Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, shall make endeavor to dispose of the above referred I.A. as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of next posting.
6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:07.05.2026 Ksj