Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/3305/2013 of LAKKANNAGARI ADEPPA Vs SMT CHOWDAMMA on 6 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3305/2013 Between: 1. LAKKANNAGARI ADEPPA, S/O. LATE LAKKANNAGARI KARIYAPPA,
APHC010661382013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3305/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. LAKKANNAGARI ADEPPA, S/O. LATE LAKKANNAGARI KARIYAPPA, R/O. OLD LEPAKSHI AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SMT CHOWDAMMA, W/o. Late Lakkannagari Anjinappa, R/o. Old Lepakshi and Mandal, Anantapur District.
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toU/sec., 115 of CPC., against order made in Ia.No.408/2011 in OP.No.5/2007 dated 19.06.2013 on the file of the Motor accidents Claims Tribunal, Hindupur cum Additional District Judge, Hindupur Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following ORDER :
On 10.04.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner requested time to get fresh instructions in the matter as to whether any cause survives or not.
2. Today, Ms.N.Devi Sree Vathsa, learned counsel representing Sri N.Aswartha Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have not received any instructions from their client and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders.
3. In view of the above and by recording the aforesaid submissions, the Civil Revision Petition is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 07.05.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3305 OF 2013 Dt: 07.05.2026 Dvs