Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/4127/2026 of Boyimpalli Chandra Sekhar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. BOYIMPALLI CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O RAJU, AGED 20 YEARS,R/O JEEDIMETLA,

APHC010262162026

IN THE H

(

THURSDA

TWO T

THE HONOURABLE DR

CRIMIN

Between:

1. BOYIMPALLI CHAND

JEEDIMETLA, HYDER

2. MAMIDALA PRAVEEN

GANDHI NAGAR, C

TELANGANA.

1. THE

STATE

OF

Prosecutor,High Court

Petition under Section

praying that in the circums

Criminal Petition, the High

No. 2 & 3 on bail in Crime

Station and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner

1.DASARI RAMAKOTES

Counsel for the Responde

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTO

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

AY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY

THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR

NAL PETITION NO: 4127/2026

DRA SEKHAR, S/O RAJU, AGED 20 YE

RABAD,STATE OF TELANGANA.

N KUMAR, ,S/O KAILASH, AGED 23 Y

HINTAL BUS STOP,HYDERABAD, S

...PETITIONER/ACC

AND

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

,Rep.

by

i

t of Judicature of Andhra Pradeshat Ama

...RESPONDENT/COMP

n 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528

stances stated in the Memorandum of G

CourtPleased to release the Petitione

No. 26 of2026, On the file of the Nakka

r/accused(S):

SWAR RAO

ent/complainant:

OR

RATAPA

EARS,R/O

EARS,R/O

STATE OF

CUSED(S)

ts

Public

aravati.

PLAINANT

8 of BNSS

Grounds of

ers/Accused

apalli Police

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4127/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3, seeking regular bail, in Crime No. 26 of2026, On the file of the Nakkapalli Police Station, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(C) r/w 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “NDPS Act”).

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 23.01.2026 at about 14:00 hours, near Vempadu Junction, Nakkapalli Mandal, while conducting vehicle checking, the police noticed two persons attempting to flee on seeing them. The police apprehended the said persons and found them in possession of a black bag containing ganja liquid. During interrogation, the accused disclosed that they had been sent by one Shyam Rakesh Kumar to Visakhapatnam to collect ganja liquid from one Balu and transport the same to Hyderabad. They further admitted that they had collected about 1.055 kilograms of ganja liquid from Duvvada Colony and were apprehended while attempting to return. The accused persons were identified, the ganja liquid was seized from their possession, and they were taken into custody.

3. Heard Sri D.Ramakoteshwara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present crime and that they are no way connected with the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 23.01.2026 and that the contraband allegedly seized, i.e., 1.005 kilograms of liquid ganja, constitutes a non commercial quantity. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioners are the sole breadwinners of their respective families and undertakes that the petitioners will abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court.

5. Per contra, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and submitted that the petitioners were apprehended while in conscious possession of the contraband. She further submits that the investigation is still pending and the statutory period is not completed. Therefore, she prayed for dismissal of the petition.

6. Having considered the submissions made by both sides and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that though the contraband involved in the present case is 01.055 kilogram of liquid ganja, which is a non-commercial quantity, the investigation is still pending and the statutory period has not yet been completed. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

7. Further, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that there are no reasonable grounds at this stage to believe that the petitioners are not guilty of the alleged offence or that they would not commit a similar offence if released on bail. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit in the present Criminal Petition.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.05.2026 KKV

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4127/2026

Date: 07.05.2026 KKV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead