Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1353/2025 of T.SIDDA REDDY Vs KONA SASHIDHAR on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1353/2025 Between: 1. T.SIDDA REDDY, S/O SRI MAHADEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.

APHC010250112025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1353/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. T.SIDDA REDDY, S/O SRI MAHADEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. MUNICIPAL HIGH SCHOOL (MAIN) KADAPA - 516002, A.P

2. D. NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O SRI. D.L. REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, PRESENTLY EMPLOYED AND WORKING AT GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL NO. 2, NEAR VEGETABLE MARKET, ANANTAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT.

3. P. MADHUSUDAN REDDY,, S/O SRI. MUNUSWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, PRESENTLY EMPLOYED AND WORKING AT Z.P. HIGH SCHOOL, BAKARAPET, CHINNA GOTTIGAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

4. K. CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. K. NAGARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. 7B, SRI VYKUNTHAPURAM, MUTHYALAREDDY PALLI, TIRUPATI-2.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. KONA SASHIDHAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SCHOOL EDUCATION (SE PROG.1) DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST.

2. VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 4TH FIOOR, B BLOCK, VTPS RD, BHIMARAJU GUTTA, IBRAHIMPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-521456

...CONTEMNOR(S):

NJS,J

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA

NJS,J

The Court made the following Order:

Learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through online submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the contempt case does not survive. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case.

2. Recording the submissions made, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:07.05.2026 Ksj

NJS,J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1353/2025 07.05.2026

Ksj

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead