Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12534/2026 of B SUBRAHAMANYESWARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF AP on 6 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 12534/2026 Between: 1. B SUBRAHAMANYESWARA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 56
APHC010237992026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 12534/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B SUBRAHAMANYESWARA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 56 YEARS, SENIOR ASSISTANT MANAGER (FAC), OFFICE AT GPCM SOCIETY LTD., OPP ITDA OFFICE, YERRAMPETA, CHINTOOR, ASR DISTRICT - 533347. R/O SARABHAVARAM VILLAGE, RAJAVAMMANGI, ASR DISTRICT - 533436.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238.
2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVT., OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SKY LARK TOWERS, D.NO.2-16-83, 11THLINE, SYAMALA NAGAR, GUNTUR - 522006.
3. THE GIRIJAN COOPERATIVE CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 530017.
4. THE GIRIJAN PRIMARY COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, GIRIJAN PRIMARY COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY,
SUNDRUPUTTU, PADERU ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT - 531024
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 4 in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Society is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider his case for promotion to the post of Junior Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Society without reference to the Charge Memos Dt.07.02.2022 23.11.2022 and pass such o IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 & 4 to consider the case the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Society without reference to the Charge Memos Dt.07.02.2022 & 23.11.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. MALLIKHARJUNA RAO PULUGU (SC FOR GIRIJAN COOPERATIVE CORPORATION LTD)
2. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following ORDER:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Manager in Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Society, which action is alleged to be illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
3. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner confined his submissions to a limited prayer, seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999.
4. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the respondents would consider the case of the petitioner, if he falls within the zone of consideration, subject to his fulfilling all the conditions prescribed under the said G.O.
5. Having heard the respective submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Manager, on regular basis can be considered in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, dated 10.06.1999.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Manager, subject to the petitioner possessing the requisite qualifications in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999, and also to conclude the enquiry, if any pending against the petitioner, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH 07.05.2026
klk
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO:12534/2026
07.05.2026 klk