Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/6817/2019 of Yanamala Rajesh Babu Vs Jahnavi V on 6 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6817/2019 Between: 1. YANAMALA RAJESH BABU, S/O YANARNALA VENKATA RAMANAIAH, AGED
APHC010375252019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6817/2019
Between:
1. YANAMALA
RAJESH
BABU,
S/O
YANARNALA
VENKATA
RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26YRS, R/O 1ST FLOOR, SBI
BUILDING, VIDHYANAGAR, KOTA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT.
2. YANAMALA VENKATA RAMANAIAH, S/O YANAMALA BUJJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51YRS, R/O 1ST FLOOR, SBI VIDHYANAGAR, KOTA
MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. YANAMALA
PADMAVATHI,
W/O
YANAMALA
VENKATA
RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39YRS, R/O 15T FLOOR, SBI
BUILDING, VIDHYANAGAR, KOTA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. JAHNAVI V, W/O YANAMALA RAJESH BABU, AGED ABOUT
20YRS,
R/O
D.NO.36,
RANGANNAGARIGADDA
VILLAGE,
CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AMARAVATI
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. VISWANATH N
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :-
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners/A1 to A3, seeking to quash the proceedings in CC.No.331 of 2018, on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Piler.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners states that C.C. No. 331 of 2018 ended in acquittal. As such, the cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
3. Recording the said statement, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
____ K.SURESH REDDY, J
Dt.07.05.2026 Asr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6817 of 2019
Date: 07.05.2026 Asr