Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/4399/2011 of Allu Narasimha Rao, Vs Yerasingu Ramayya on 6 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4399/2011 Between: 1. ALLU NARASIMHA RAO,, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU CULTIVATION,
APHC010594932011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4399/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ALLU NARASIMHA RAO,, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 52-3-18, SOMESWARA AGARAHARAM, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. YERASINGU RAMAYYA, S/O. BAPAYYA COFFE HOTEL, R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. YERASINGU MANGAMMA, W/O. RAMAYYA HUSBAND'S PROTECTION R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. YERASINGU SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RAMAYYA COFFEE HOTEL, R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. YERASINGU LAKSHMI PADMAVATHI, W/O. MURALI KRISHNA WEAVERS COLONY, R/O. D.NO. 51-5-26, RAMARAOPET, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. MEDAPATI RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O. RAJA REDDY R/O. D.NO. 6-75, BAZAR CENTER KAVITAM, PODUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P DURGA PRASAD
The Court made the following ORDER :
On 17.04.2026, this Court passed the following order: “On 27.02.2026, it was represented on that day the sole petitioner died and necessary steps to bring the Legal Representatives of the deceased petitioner on record are to be taken. Accordingly, time was granted to file appropriate application and the matter was adjourned to 13.03.2026 to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner, to file appropriate application to bring the Legal Representatives. However, no steps were taken so far. Today, when the matter is called the learned counsel for the petitioner sought a adjournment to comply with the order dated 27.02.2026. Though the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" to give one more fair chance to the petitioner, the matter is adjourned. List the matter on 01.05.2026 under the same caption, as a last chance.”
2. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner and in spite of granting several opportunities to take steps to bring the legal representatives of the deceased sole petitioner, no steps have been taken.
3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 07.05.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4399 OF 2011 Dt: 07.05.2026 Dvs