Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/484/2026 of SHAIK SHANNAZ BEGUM Vs PISA PAVAN KUMAR on 6 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. SHAIK SHANNAZ BEGUM, W/O. SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO.8 LAKSHMAIAH STREET,
APHC010148692026
IN THE H
(
THURSDA
TWO T
THE HONOURABLE DR
CRIMINAL
Between:
1. SHAIK SHANNAZ BE
ABOUT 51 YEARS.
LAKSHMAIAH
STR
VIJAYAWADA -1.
1. PISA PAVAN KUMAR
34 YEARS. SERVI
KOTHAPET,
VIJAY
2/RESPONDENTCOM
2. THE STATE OF AN
PUBLIC PROSECUTO
Revision filed under
circumstances
stated
in
CriminalRevisionCase, the
the Judgment dated 09-09-
the file of Honble XIII Ad
Krishna at Vijayawada in s
dismissed
the
Appeal
CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24
Civil Judge - Cum- Metr
Petitioner/Accused was c
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR
L REVISION CASE NO: 484/2026
EGUM, W/O. SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR
. HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO.8-6-7
REET,
PANJA
CENTRE,
WY
...PE
AND
R, S/O. VENKATA RAMANA RAO, AGE
ICE, R/O. D.NO.9-41-4, ANJANE
YAWADA
-1.
....RESPONDEN
MPLAINANT
NDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED
OR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVA
...RESPON
Section 397/401 of CrPC praying t
n
the
affidavit
filed
in
support
High Court may be pleased tobeing ag
-2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1
ddl.District Sessions Judge (Fast Tr
so far it went against the Petitioner/Ac by confirming the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
p 4/07/2019, on the file of Hon’ble Prinic ropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, wh convicted under section 255(2) of Cr.P
RATAPA R, AGED 73 74, YNCHIPET, TITIONER ED ABOUT EYAVAGU, NT NO. BY THE ATHI. NDENT(S): that in the t of the ggrieved by 78/2019 on rack Court) ccused and passed in cipal Junior hereby, the P.C, for the
offence under section 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 9 months and also pay fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- in default of payment of fine, she shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months. The entire fine amount of Rs.1,50,000/- shall be paid as compensation to the complainant under section 357(3) CP.C, and to acquit the accused for the said offence, begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case on the following among other grounds.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the Petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 30 days in representing the above Criminal Revision Case and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case
For the reasons stated in the accompanying petition, the Petitioner herein respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to condone the delay of ( 93 ) days in filing the present Criminal Revision Case and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case leased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the judgement in CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24/07/2019, on the file of Hon’ble Prinicipal Junior Civil Judge - Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawadaand pass such other order or orders, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
pleased to allow the above CRL.RC.No. Of 2026 by Compounding the offence against the Revision Petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.868/2018, on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge - cum - Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Vijayawada for the offence U/S 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’bie Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment in CrI. Appeal No.178/2019, dated: 09/09/2025, on the file of Hon’ble XIII Addl.District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Krishna at Vijayawada in confirming the conviction and sentence imposed in C.C.No.868/2019, dated: 24/07/2019, on the file of THE PRINICIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-METROPOLITAN VIJAYAWADA, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MOHANNAIR RAJEEV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 484/2026
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the Judgment, dated 09-09-2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.178/2019 on the file of learned XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Krishna at Vijayawada, confirming the Judgment passed by the learned Prinicipal Junior Civil Judge - Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada in CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24.07.2019.
2. Heard Sri Mohannair Rajeev Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mahesh Kumar Kancherla, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Smt.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
3. I.A.No.4 of have been filed by the petitioner and complainant/respondent No.1 along with combined joint memo, seeking to record compromise in the present revision and to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the conviction and sentence passed against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.868 /2018.
4. The petitioner and respondent No.1 are present and submitted that they have compromised the matter. The Respondent No.1 submitted that she has received the amount of Rs.1,70,000/- towards full and final settlement as per the terms of compromise.
5. In that view of the matter, I.A.No.4 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of compromise, subject to the payment of an amount of Rs.10,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court of Andhra Pradesh by the petitioner/accused, in turn, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to utilize the amount for the welfare of the children who are in the Government NGO Homes to purchase anything which they require. In default, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed.
6. Accordingly, the Judgment dated 09-09-2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.178/2019 on the file of learned XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Krishna at Vijayawada, confirming the Judgment passed by the learned Prinicipal Junior Civil Judge - Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada in CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24.07.2019 are hereby set aside. Accordingly, the petitioner/accused is acquitted.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 07.05.2026 KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 484/2026
Dated 07.05.2026 KKV