Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/484/2026 of SHAIK SHANNAZ BEGUM Vs PISA PAVAN KUMAR on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. SHAIK SHANNAZ BEGUM, W/O. SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO.8 LAKSHMAIAH STREET,

APHC010148692026

IN THE H

(

THURSDA

TWO T

THE HONOURABLE DR

CRIMINAL

Between:

1. SHAIK SHANNAZ BE

ABOUT 51 YEARS.

LAKSHMAIAH

STR

VIJAYAWADA -1.

1. PISA PAVAN KUMAR

34 YEARS. SERVI

KOTHAPET,

VIJAY

2/RESPONDENTCOM

2. THE STATE OF AN

PUBLIC PROSECUTO

Revision filed under

circumstances

stated

in

CriminalRevisionCase, the

the Judgment dated 09-09-

the file of Honble XIII Ad

Krishna at Vijayawada in s

dismissed

the

Appeal

CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24

Civil Judge - Cum- Metr

Petitioner/Accused was c

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

AY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY

THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR

L REVISION CASE NO: 484/2026

EGUM, W/O. SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR

. HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO.8-6-7

REET,

PANJA

CENTRE,

WY

...PE

AND

R, S/O. VENKATA RAMANA RAO, AGE

ICE, R/O. D.NO.9-41-4, ANJANE

YAWADA

-1.

....RESPONDEN

MPLAINANT

NDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED

OR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVA

...RESPON

Section 397/401 of CrPC praying t

n

the

affidavit

filed

in

support

High Court may be pleased tobeing ag

-2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1

ddl.District Sessions Judge (Fast Tr

so far it went against the Petitioner/Ac by confirming the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Judgment

p 4/07/2019, on the file of Hon’ble Prinic ropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, wh convicted under section 255(2) of Cr.P

RATAPA R, AGED 73 74, YNCHIPET, TITIONER ED ABOUT EYAVAGU, NT NO. BY THE ATHI. NDENT(S): that in the t of the ggrieved by 78/2019 on rack Court) ccused and passed in cipal Junior hereby, the P.C, for the

offence under section 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 9 months and also pay fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- in default of payment of fine, she shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months. The entire fine amount of Rs.1,50,000/- shall be paid as compensation to the complainant under section 357(3) CP.C, and to acquit the accused for the said offence, begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case on the following among other grounds.

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the Petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 30 days in representing the above Criminal Revision Case and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case

For the reasons stated in the accompanying petition, the Petitioner herein respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to condone the delay of ( 93 ) days in filing the present Criminal Revision Case and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case leased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the judgement in CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24/07/2019, on the file of Hon’ble Prinicipal Junior Civil Judge - Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawadaand pass such other order or orders, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

pleased to allow the above CRL.RC.No. Of 2026 by Compounding the offence against the Revision Petitioner/Accused in C.C.No.868/2018, on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge - cum - Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Vijayawada for the offence U/S 138 r/w 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’bie Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment in CrI. Appeal No.178/2019, dated: 09/09/2025, on the file of Hon’ble XIII Addl.District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Krishna at Vijayawada in confirming the conviction and sentence imposed in C.C.No.868/2019, dated: 24/07/2019, on the file of THE PRINICIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-METROPOLITAN VIJAYAWADA, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MOHANNAIR RAJEEV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

2. The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 484/2026

ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the Judgment, dated 09-09-2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.178/2019 on the file of learned XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Krishna at Vijayawada, confirming the Judgment passed by the learned Prinicipal Junior Civil Judge - Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada in CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24.07.2019.

2. Heard Sri Mohannair Rajeev Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mahesh Kumar Kancherla, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Smt.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

3. I.A.No.4 of have been filed by the petitioner and complainant/respondent No.1 along with combined joint memo, seeking to record compromise in the present revision and to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the conviction and sentence passed against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.868 /2018.

4. The petitioner and respondent No.1 are present and submitted that they have compromised the matter. The Respondent No.1 submitted that she has received the amount of Rs.1,70,000/- towards full and final settlement as per the terms of compromise.

5. In that view of the matter, I.A.No.4 of 2026 is allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of compromise, subject to the payment of an amount of Rs.10,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court of Andhra Pradesh by the petitioner/accused, in turn, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to utilize the amount for the welfare of the children who are in the Government NGO Homes to purchase anything which they require. In default, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed.

6. Accordingly, the Judgment dated 09-09-2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.178/2019 on the file of learned XIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Krishna at Vijayawada, confirming the Judgment passed by the learned Prinicipal Junior Civil Judge - Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada in CC.No.868/2018, dated: 24.07.2019 are hereby set aside. Accordingly, the petitioner/accused is acquitted.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 07.05.2026 KKV

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 484/2026

Dated 07.05.2026 KKV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead