WP/8346/2025 of SAMAREDDY KONDALA RAO Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 May 2026

1. SAMAREDDY KONDALA RAO, S/O BALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SUNDRUPUTTU VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAIU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. SMT. SAMAREDDY BHAGYAVATHI, D/O SAMAREDDY KONDALARAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. RESIDENT OF SUNDRUPUTTU VILLAGE,

PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICTANDHRA PRADESH.

3. SAMAREDDY SIMHADHRI RAO, S/O KONDALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 RESIDENT OF SUNDRUPUTTU VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICTANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PADERU, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. THE TAHSILDHAR, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. SRI MATHAM VIJAYAKUMAR, VAO/VRO, HUKUMPET MANDAL,

ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. SRI KONTA CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O APPANNA, OCC PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER, ITDA SEKARI VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

6. SRI CHINNA RAO, OCC HEADMASTER, ITDA, PEDABAYALU MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

7. SRI VARTHANA BONJUBABU, S/O (LATE) APPALASWAMY, GUDIVADA VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL

ALLURI SEETHARAMARAJU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction restraining the unofficial respondents No. 4 to 6 from continuing the illegal construction on the petitioners land situated at Paderu Village and Mandal in Alluri Seetharama Raju District vide Account No. 128, Survey No. 122-5, measuring Ac. 0-80 cents, and Survey No. 89-5, measuring Ac. 1-36 cents, totalling Ac. 2-16 cents, as illegal arbitrary and unjust, by directing Respondent No. 3 to conduct a detailed inquiry and remove the illegal encroachment by considering the Petitioners representation dated 07-03-2025, including the F-Line Application dated 17- 07-2023 and subsequent complaints and consequently direct the 2nd respondent (District Collector, Alluri Seetharama Raju District) to take appropriate action against the 4th respondent for illegal occupation of land and violation of service conduct rules and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the Petitioners F-Line Application dated 17-07-2023 and subsequent representation dated 07-03-2025, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass appropriate orders and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. NANI BABU ROBBA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order:

Heard Sri Nani Babu Robba, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. Despite the service of notice, no appearance is entered on behalf of the respondent Nos.4 to 7.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is against the inaction on the part of the respondents in processing the application filed by the petitioners, dated 17-07- 2023 for conducting the survey.

3. When the matter has been taken up for consideration today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed before the Court a copy of instructions received from the Tahsildar, dated 09.10.2025 in the case. A perusal of the same would reflect as under:

“Petitioner has executed settlement agreement, dated 15.10.2016 (un-registered) in favour of Sri Kurusa Simhachalam, S/o (Late) Kannayya of Kothapaderu village of Paderu Mandal basing on the registered document No.113 of 1976, dated 23.06.1976. Further the petitioner executed one Assurance Deed dated 06.02.2021 in favour of Sri Varthana Bonjubabu of Gudivada Village of Paderu Mandal for an extent of Ac.0.75 cents of land is vested to him.

It is submitted that, Paderu Village in online records (webland) was not displayed from past five (5) years due to technical issue and applications for mutations and F-Line petitions also could not be processed for the same reason.

It is further submitted that, recently i.e., from 29.09.2025 the said Paderu Village is being reflected in webland and presently applications for both mutations and F-Line are processed. Therefore, the petitioner’s F-Line application will be considered by following due procedure and as above Technical issue has been resolved.”

4. Having regard to the above and as it has been stated that the technical issues in maintaining the web land records have been resolved, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to pass appropriate orders on the application filed by the petitioners, dated 17.07.2023 in accordance with law, after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing the petitioners and the unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 7, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of the order.

5. The said instructions of the Tahsildar, dated 09.10.2025 are placed on record.

6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 06-05-2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 8346/2025

Dated: 06-05-2026 MSI