Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1409/2025 of KASI UMA SHANKAR Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1409/2025 Between: 1. KASI UMA SHANKAR, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,

APHC010025982025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

WRIT PETITION NO: 1409/2025

Between:

1. KASI UMA SHANKAR, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT

21 YEARS, R/O 2-39, KASI VARI PETA, THOTLAPALEM, MARLAPALEM, MUMMIDIVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR

KONA SEEMA DISTRICT.

2. KASI BALAYOGI,, S/O MAHALAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 2-39, KASI VARI PETA, THOTLAPALEM, MARLAPALEM, MUMMIDIVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA

DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME

DEPARTMENT

SECRETARIAT

VELAGAPUDI

AMARAVATHI

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DR. AMALAPURAM.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA

SEEMA DISTRICT, AMALAPURAM.

4. THE CIRCULE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUMMIDIVARAM CIRCULE, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT, MUMMIDIVARAM.

5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REP BY ITS SUB-INSPECTOR OF

POLICE, MUMMIDIVARAM POLICE STATION, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR

KONA SEEMA DISTRICT, MUMMIDIVARAM.

6. KASI VIJAYAKUMARI, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT

40 YEARS, R/O PPALAGUPTAM MANDAL, DR. CHINTLACHEMVU, CHALLAPALLI VILLAGE, B.R.AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT.

7. KASI VENKATA RAMANA, , S/O KASI SRI RAMULU, BURUGUPETA, KARRIVANIREVUVU VILLAGE, B.R.AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA

DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 4TH and 5TH respondents not conducted proper investigation my father murder case vide FIR No. 356/2024 dated 04-12-2024

of the Mummidivaram Police Station and in interfere with personal life and liberty by calling to the Police Station or harassing and insisting us to hand over the Gold Ornaments and fixed deposits to the 6TH respondent and settled Murder case with 6TH and 7TH respondents, the 6TH respondent non other then, the1ST Petitioner mother and wife of Petitioner deceased father, 6TH and 7TH respondents are only suspected with 1ST Petitioner father murder case is illegal. Arbitrary, Violation of Principal of Natural Justice and also Violation of Fundamental Rights under the Constitution of India and consequently direct to 4TH and 5TH respondents conducted proper investigation my father murder case vide FIR No. 356/2024 dated 04-12-2024

of the Mummidivaram Police Station pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to directing the all Respondents including the 4TH AND 5TH

respondents in not interfere with Petitioners personal life and liberty by calling to the Police Station for harassing by insisting the Petitioners to hand over the Gold Ornaments, fixed deposits to the 6TH respondent by settled Murder case with 6TH and 7TH respondents pending the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. G SIMHADRI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

WRIT PETITION NO: 1409/2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructuous.

Taking note of submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

Dated:06.05.2026. SSA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead