Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1409/2025 of KASI UMA SHANKAR Vs THE STATE OF AP on 5 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1409/2025 Between: 1. KASI UMA SHANKAR, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
APHC010025982025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1409/2025
Between:
1. KASI UMA SHANKAR, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT
21 YEARS, R/O 2-39, KASI VARI PETA, THOTLAPALEM, MARLAPALEM, MUMMIDIVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR
KONA SEEMA DISTRICT.
2. KASI BALAYOGI,, S/O MAHALAKSHMI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 2-39, KASI VARI PETA, THOTLAPALEM, MARLAPALEM, MUMMIDIVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME
DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT
VELAGAPUDI
AMARAVATHI
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DR. AMALAPURAM.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA
SEEMA DISTRICT, AMALAPURAM.
4. THE CIRCULE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUMMIDIVARAM CIRCULE, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT, MUMMIDIVARAM.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REP BY ITS SUB-INSPECTOR OF
POLICE, MUMMIDIVARAM POLICE STATION, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR
KONA SEEMA DISTRICT, MUMMIDIVARAM.
6. KASI VIJAYAKUMARI, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT
40 YEARS, R/O PPALAGUPTAM MANDAL, DR. CHINTLACHEMVU, CHALLAPALLI VILLAGE, B.R.AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT.
7. KASI VENKATA RAMANA, , S/O KASI SRI RAMULU, BURUGUPETA, KARRIVANIREVUVU VILLAGE, B.R.AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 4TH and 5TH respondents not conducted proper investigation my father murder case vide FIR No. 356/2024 dated 04-12-2024
of the Mummidivaram Police Station and in interfere with personal life and liberty by calling to the Police Station or harassing and insisting us to hand over the Gold Ornaments and fixed deposits to the 6TH respondent and settled Murder case with 6TH and 7TH respondents, the 6TH respondent non other then, the1ST Petitioner mother and wife of Petitioner deceased father, 6TH and 7TH respondents are only suspected with 1ST Petitioner father murder case is illegal. Arbitrary, Violation of Principal of Natural Justice and also Violation of Fundamental Rights under the Constitution of India and consequently direct to 4TH and 5TH respondents conducted proper investigation my father murder case vide FIR No. 356/2024 dated 04-12-2024
of the Mummidivaram Police Station pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to directing the all Respondents including the 4TH AND 5TH
respondents in not interfere with Petitioners personal life and liberty by calling to the Police Station for harassing by insisting the Petitioners to hand over the Gold Ornaments, fixed deposits to the 6TH respondent by settled Murder case with 6TH and 7TH respondents pending the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G SIMHADRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1409/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructuous.
Taking note of submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:06.05.2026. SSA