Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1382/2008 of Pamula Subbayamma, Vs The State of A.P., on 5 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1382/2008 Between: 1. PAMULA SUBBAYAMMA,, W/O. KRISHNA, R/O. LEMALLE VILLAGE
APHC010611162008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1382/2008
Between:
1. PAMULA SUBBAYAMMA,, W/O. KRISHNA, R/O. LEMALLE VILLAGE
& POST, AMARAVATHI RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT
OF A.P., HYDERABAD.
2. SHAIK VALI, S/O.
FAREED, R/O. ANJANEYAPET, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the judgment dt.09.09.2008 passed in Crl.A.No. 269 of 2007 on the file of the IX Addl.
Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur as confirming in CC.No. 385 of 2006 on the file of the V Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Guntur, dt.13.8.2007, that the sentence and convicted U/s. 138 of N.I., Act to undergo R.I. for a period of four months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- SI for one month, the revision petitoner perefers this revision IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CRLRCMP 1867 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail by suspending the sentence of imprisonment
passed in CC.No. 385 of 2006 on the file of the V Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Guntur, dt.13 .8.2007 as confirmed in Crl.A.No. 269 of 2007 on the file of the IX Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur, dt.09.09.2008, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. O KAILASHNATH REDDY
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1382/2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present petitioner is a lady who was convicted by the learned Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 18811 (For brevity, N.I.Act). The said conviction was initially challenged before the learned Appellate Court, wherein the appeal was also dismissed by confirming the order of sentence.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the parties has submitted that the petitioner is aged more than 65 years and is also very poor, who earning her livelihood as a maid servant in other houses. The learned counsel for the petitioner, with his usual fairness, submits that, in these peculiar circumstances, considering the financial condition and present status of the petitioner, the order of conviction may not be allowed.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent raised certain objections and submitted that the learned Trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court have rightly passed the impugned orders, and that there are no merits in the present criminal revision petition to entertain.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not raised any contention with regard to the merits of the matter. Thus, the order of conviction is hereby affirmed.
1 N.I.Act, 1881
5. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present financial condition of the petitioner, and her present status, it appears that the petitioner, being a lady aged above 65 years and suffering from several ailments, cannot directed to undergo a sentence of imprisonment of any description.
6. Accordingly, the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court is hereby modified. The sentence of imprisonment is converted into a further fine of Rs. 500/- (Rupees five hundred only).
7. The petitioner is directed to deposit the said fine amount before the learned Trial Court within four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
8. With the above observations, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:06.05.2026. SSA