Andhra Pradesh High Court
PIL/317/2014 of CONVENER, GREATER VISAKHA ANTI-CORRUPTION PORAATA SAMITHY Vs PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMIN., HYDERABAD & 10 OTHERS on 5 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.317 of 2014 Bench Sr.No:- 3 [3579] Greater Visakha Anti-Corruption Poraata Samithy, represented by its Convener Smt P. Dhanalakshmi. ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010481802014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.317 of
Bench Sr.No:-
Greater Visakha Anti-Corruption Poraata Samithy, represented by its Convener Smt P. Dhanalakshmi. ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner : None Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A. S. C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporations – R-4 Mr. V. V. Satish, learned Standing Counsel for A.P.E.P.D.C.L. – R-5
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE : 6th May 2026 LISA GILL, CJ.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that a thorough inquiry was conducted into the allegations raised in this writ petition regarding illegal encroachment upon Government land. However, it was found that no such encroachment has been carried out on Government property and construction has been raised entirely on private land.
HCJ & NJS, J PIL. No.317 of 2014
2. Learned counsel, while referring to counter filed on behalf of respondent No.4, further submits that Complaint No.1875 of 2014 had also been filed before Hon’ble Lokayukta wherein reports dated 12.12.2013 and 01.09.2014 had been submitted.
3. None had appeared on behalf of petitioner on the last date of hearing. On 29.04.2026, this petition was adjourned for today to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner.
4. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
LISA GILL, CJ
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
AMD
HCJ & NJS, J PIL. No.317 of 2014
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.317 of 2014
Dt:06.05.2026
AMD