Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5483/2026 of Sri Chilakalapudi Veera Venkata Naga Rajendra Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 5483/2026 Between: 1. SRI CHILAKALAPUDI VEERA VENKATA NAGA RAJENDRA
APHC010090792026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 5483/2026
Between:
1. SRI CHILAKALAPUDI VEERA VENKATA NAGA RAJENDRA KUMAR,, S/O CHILAKALAPUDI VENKATA SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT
43 YEARS, OCCUPATION AUDITOR, RIO FLAT NO. 203, KARTHIK
RESIDENCY, ARAVINDA STREET, NEAR RTC WORKSHOP ROAD, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH -520 012
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 522238
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CRIMES, THE SPECIAL
INVESTIGATION TEAM (SIT), NTR POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA. 520010
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 520008
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHAVARAM POLICE
STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 520008
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other
appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in repeatedly summoning me to the Machavaram Police Station, N.T.R. District, and have been threatening me of arrest, unless the amount arrived at under the Mutual Compromise Agreement dated 12.12.2024 is paid to the police authorities, without issuance of notice, and subjecting me to harassment, and intimidation, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent not to summon and detain me in the Machavaram Police Station, N.T.R. District without following due process of law, and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2fa Respondent not to summon me to the Machavaram Police Station, N.T.R. District, and not to threaten me of arrest, unless the amount arrived at under the Mutual Compromise Agreement dated 12.12.2024 is paid to the police authorities, without due notice or without following the procedure established by law, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT CHALASANI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION NO: 5483 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is preferred seeking necessary direction to 2nd respondent, who allegedly summoning the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to arrest unless the amount arrived at under the Mutual Compromise Agreement dated 12.12.2024 be paid to the police authorities.
2. The written instructions are placed on record by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. It appears from the written instructions that the present petitioner is allegedly involved in a crime as assistant of accused No.1 of that crime wherein a huge amount of money of Rs.350,00,00,000/- are involved. It further appears that the petitioner has received some money through Mutual Compromise before the Lok Adalath.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for parties, it appears that police must not be restrained to investigate any case but at the same time, the police cannot force any person to deposit any money to any account during the course of investigation of the Crime. If it appears to the police that some money was illegally begotten that money may be freezed in a bank account.
4. In the said circumstances, the police may investigate the offence according to law and may call for the petitioner or any person to the police station for the purpose of investigation. It has been mentioned in the written instructions that nearly five times petitioner was called, but he did not comply the notice. Having taken note of the fact, the police authority is at liberty to take necessary action according to law, to conduct the investigation in free and fair manner, but for that purpose they cannot pressurize any accused or victim to pay any amount of money to any account or to admit any guilt.
5. With the above directions, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of.There is no order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:06.05.2026. sj
WRIT PETITION NO: 5483 of 2026
Dated: 06.05.2026. sj