Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/10035/2026 of K. Jaya Prabha, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10035/2026 Between: 1. K. JAYA PRABHA,, W/O. G.K. KALAI RAJ AN, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O.

APHC010198792026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 10035/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. K. JAYA PRABHA,, W/O. G.K. KALAI RAJ AN, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3, VADAMALI MAISTRY STREET, KONDITOPU, CHENNAI - 600079.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 51.7503.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 524121.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, B.N. KANDRIGA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517645.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any it or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dt.03.03.2025 for mutation of the name of the petitioner in the revenue records and for issuance of pattadhar passbooks for the lands admeasuring Ac.0.74 cents in Sy.No.369/ 12A, Ac.0.13 cents in Sy.No.369/

12C, Ac.0.53 cents in Sy.No.369/ 13A, Ac.0.59 cents in Sy.No.369/ 14A, Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.369/ 15A, Ac.0.62 cents in Sy.No.369/ 16A and Ac.0.52 cents in Sy.No.369/ 17, total admeasuring Ac.3.63 cents, situated in Kallivettu Village, B.N. Kandriga Mandal, Tirupati District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 16, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dt.03.03.2025 for mutation of the name of the petitioner in the revenue records and for issuance of Title Deed / Pattadhar passbooks and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dt.03.03.2025 for mutation of the name of the petitioner in the revenue records and for issuance of Title Deed/ Pattadhar passbooks for the lands admeasuring Ac.0.74 cents in Sy.No.369/ 12A, Ac.0.13 cents in Sy.No.369/ 12C, Ac.0.53 cents in Sy.No.369/ 13A, Ac.0.59 cents in Sy.No.369/ 14A, Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.369/ 15A, Ac.0.62 cents in Sy.No.369/ 16A and Ac.0.52 cents in Sy.No.369/ 17, total admeasuring Ac.3.63 cents, situated in Kallivettu Village, B.N. Kandriga Mandal, Tirupati District., pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following ORDER:

At the hearing, the learned counsel for the parties consented to the disposal of the writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made an application and the same was returned and requests this Court to permit the petitioner to make fresh application along with relevant documents.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to file an application under Form-6A along with all the relevant documents, within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. Upon filing such application along with all necessary documents, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders by providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.05.2026

M K K

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION No: 10035 of 2026

Dated: 06.05.2026 M K K

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead