Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2770/2026 of Budhala Prabhu Jaya Chander, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 2770/2026 Between: 1. BUDHALA PRABHU JAYA CHANDER,, S/O. KANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
APHC010047482026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2770/2026
Between:
1. BUDHALA PRABHU JAYA CHANDER,, S/O. KANTHAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. 36-9-30 B, NEHRU NAGAR, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA-520010.
2. CHINNAM MOHAN VIJAY BHASKAR RAO,, S/O. FRANCIS, AGED
ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED DIOCESAN ACCOUNTANT, R/O,.
32-13-53/103,
OPP.
AMMA
KALYANA
MANDAPAM,
RAMANAIAH STREET, VIJAYAWADA-10.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT,
MACHILIPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-521001.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMAN JUNCTION CIRCLE, GANNAVARAM SUB-DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521105.
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, HANUMAN JUNCTION CIRCLE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503.
5. THE DIOCESE OF KRISHNAGODAVARI COASTAL ANDHRA, OF
THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS BISHOP
AND CHAIRMAN, RT.REV.DR.T.GEORGE CORNELIOUS, S/O. NOT
KNOWN
TO
THE
PETITIONER,
CSI
KRISHNA-DIOCESE,
VIJAYAWADA,
CSI
COMPLEX,
GOPAL
REDDY
ROAD,
GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA-520002.
6. K VIVEKANAND, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. PASTOR, RIO. AZRAIAHPET, NUZIVEDU, ELURU DISTRICT-521201.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Police in interfering with the religious and day-to-day affairs, worships (including prayers) of the CSI Zion Church, Bapulapadu Village and Mandal, Krishna District at the instance of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 and in threatening the Petitioners with dire consequences and false cases in the event they don't cooperate and hand over the affairs of the Church to the Sixth Respondent Pastor as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19, 21, 25 and 26 and consequently direct the Respondent Police not to interfere with the religious and day-to-day affairs, worships (including prayers) of the Church and not to pressurize the Petitioners or the Members of the CSI Zion Church to cooperate and hand over the affairs of the Church to the Sixth Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondent Police not to interfere with the religious and day-to-day affairs, worships (including prayers) of the CSI Zion Church, Bapulapadu Village and Mandal, Krishna District at the instance of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 and threaten the Petitioners or the Members of the Church with dire consequences and force the induction of Sixth Respondent as Pastor of the Church and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GUNDAPU RAJESH KUMAR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2770/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms. T.Keerthi, learned counsel appearing Mr. M.R.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructuous.
Taking note of submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:05.05.2026. SSA