Andhra Pradesh High Court

WA/595/2026 of Sri Jillella Nanaji Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 May 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT APPEAL NO: 595/2026 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent allow the present Writ Appeal and set aside

APHC010251832026

IN TH

TUES

TWO

THE HONOURABLE SR

THE HONOURAB

W

Writ Appeal under c

Appeal and set aside the

orders in W.P. No. 96

adjourned the matter wi

relief, and consequently

impugned proceedings in

the 5th respondent, insof

the writ petition, and pass

Between:

1. SRI JILLELLA NANA MAKANA AGED RAMACHANDRAPU KONASEEMA DIST

1. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY TO G SECRETARIAT, VE 522503.

2. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY TO SECRETARIAT, VE E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G WRIT APPEAL NO: 595/2026 clause 15 of the Letters Patent allow t e orders dated 10.04.2026 and cons 55 of 2026, whereby the learned thout considering the appellants pra y be pleased to grant interim susp n Rc.No.229/Supdt/2026 dated 01.03. far as the appellant is concerned, pend s AJI, S/O. JILLELLA ANANADA RAO C 30 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 5-4, ODU URAM MADAL,DR.B.R TRICT ANDHRA PRADESH-533260. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPAR ELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, ANDHRA ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPAR ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHR DESH

DRANATH ROY GEDELA the present Writ sequential other Single Judge ayer for interim pension of the 2026 issued by ding disposal of C/O. KISHORE URU VILLAGE, R.AMBEDKHAR ...APPELLANT TS PRINCIPAL RTMENT, A.P. A PRADESH - TS PRINCIPAL RTMENT, A.P. RA PRADESH -

Page 1 of 3

522503.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, DR.B.R. AMBEDKHAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT COLLECTORATE BUILDING, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001.

4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FIRE SERVICES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,

FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA

NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520002.

5. THE DISTRICT/DISASTER RESPONSE ANDFIRE OFFICER / SUPERINTENDENT OF FIRE SERVICES, FIRE SERVICES DEPARTMENT, DR.B.R.AMBEDKHAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing order dated 10.04.2026 in W.P. No. 9655 of 2026, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation and implementation of the Final Order dated 09.05.2025 passed in W.P. No. 11680 of 2025, on the file of this pending final adjudication of the accompanying Writ Appeal, and Pass Counsel for the Appellant:

1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

2. GP FOR REVENUE

Page 2 of 3

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

This intra Court appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent is preferred against the docket order of the learned Single Judge, dated 10.04.2026, passed in writ petition No.9655 of 2026, whereby, he has directed to post the matter on 24.04.2026 on the request made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, seeking time to get instructions in the matter.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

3. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge did not decide anything on the merits of the interlocutory application. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the learned Single Judge did not pass any interim order, as sought for and adjourned the matter, for instructions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. When the learned Single Judge did not decide anything on merits and did not pass any adverse order against the appellant herein in the interlocutory application filed by him, we are of the considered view that the writ appeal cannot be entertained and it is not maintainable. If the appellant got any urgency to obtain interim orders, he can as well make a request before the learned Single Judge to pass appropriate orders, according to law, after the learned Assistant Government Pleader seek instructions, as ordered by the learned Single Judge.

4. Therefore, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the appellant is at liberty to urge before the learned Single Judge for expeditious disposal of his interlocutory application, passing an appropriate order in the interlocutory application filed by him. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Date: 05.05.2026 MDP

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead