Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1738/2026 of Rompicherla Yesupadam, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 4 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1738/2026 Between: 1. ROMPICHERLA YESUPADAM,, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA
APHC010025812026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1738/2026
Between:
1. ROMPICHERLA YESUPADAM,, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,OCC
CULTIVATION,
R/O.
NULAKANIVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT,
KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH-522238 .
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534001.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -534001.
4. THE
STATION
HOUSE
OFFICER,
TADEKELAPUDI
POLICE
STATION, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT - 534452.
5. ROMPICHERLA YOHAN MOHAN, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA
JORGE, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.
KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534449
6. ROMPICHERLA JACOB, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED
ABOUT 60 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION R/O. NULAKANIVARIGUDEM
VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT, KAMAVARAPUKOTA
MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,, ANDHRA PRADESH -- 534449
7. ROMPICHERLA MOSHA RAJU, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,OCC
CULTIVATION,
R/O.
NULAKANIVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT,
KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534449
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 in not considering the representation dt 24-12-2025 given by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 and 300A of constitution of India and also direct the respondent no.1 to 4 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members by considering the representation dt 24-12-2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 to 4 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members by considering the representation dt:
24-12-2025, pending disposal of Writ Petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1738/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition has filed against in action of police authority for not taking proper care on representation of the petitioner dated 24.12.2025.
Through written instructions from the Home Department, it has been stated that Station House officer concerned has not received any representation of petitioner on 24.12.2025.
Taking note of the said aspect, the petitioner is further directed to approach concerned police station to lodge his complaint. On receiving such complaint, police authorities shall take proper steps according to law.
Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:05.05.2026. SSA