Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/3443/2026 of Ariggela Himakar alias Arigala Himakar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3443/2026 Between: 1. ARIGGELA HIMAKAR ALIAS ARIGALA HIMAKAR, SON OF
APHC010224322026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. ARIGGELA
HIMAKAR
ALIAS
ARIGALA
HIMAKAR,
SON
OF
GOVINDU, AGED 33 YEARS, OCC APMDCL EMPLOYEE/O D.NO.
9/168M, LAKSHMI NAGAR, RAILWAY KODUR TOWN AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.
BY
ITS
PUBLICPROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI,THROUGH
SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAILWAYKODUR POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. CHINTALA
BHUMIKA,
W/O
HIMAKAR,
AGED
YEARS.NARASAMPET, RAILWAY KODUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.
MOBILE9491039261
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner/Accused No.1 herein in the event of arrest by the respondent complainant in connection with the Cr.No.411 of 2025 of Railway Kodur Police Station and the Petitioner is abide and obliged by any conditions as imposed by this Honourable Court while enlarging on bail Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. V SURENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Surendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file a fresh application before the concerned Jurisdictional Court.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition file a fresh application before the concerned Jurisdictional Court.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 05.05.2026. UPS
Dt: 05.05.2026
UPS