Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/27457/2025 of KATTA CHINNODU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 27457/2025 Between: 1. KATTA CHINNODU, S/O. PYDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC
APHC010523362025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27457/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KATTA CHINNODU, S/O. PYDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. PEDAGOLLAPALEM VILLAGE, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT
AT ANAKAPALLI, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI REVENUE DIVISION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, SABBAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5.
5. KATTA APPA RAO, S/O. LATE SIMHACHALAM AGED 48 YEARS, OC CULTIVATION, 6.
6. KATTA ARJUNA RAO, S/O. LATE SIMHACHALAM, AGED 44 YEARS, OCCCULTIVATION, 7
7. SIRIPILLI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATA RAMANA AGED 44
YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, RESPONDENT NOS 5 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF D.NO.18-44,
SIMHAGIRI COLONY, SALAGRAMAPURAM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondent No. 4 in not considering petitioners Application under Form -VI (A) submitted along with representation, dated 20.08.2025 for issuance of e -Pattadar Pass Book cum Title Deed for his Agricultural Land admeasuring Ac. 3.01 Cents covered by Sy. No.29 of Pedagollapalem Village of Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, Erstwhile Visakhapatnam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4TH Respondent to issue e-Pattadar Passbook- cum-Title Deed and mutate his name in all online web land record of rights including Adangal/Pahanies, 1-B Report etc., in respect of petitioners above said land by considering said application/ representation and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 4th Respondent to consider petitioners application/representation dated 20.08.2025 submitted for issuing e-Pattadar Passbook-cum-Title Deed and mutate his name in all online web land record of rights such as Adangal/Pahanies, 1-B Report etc., in his favor connected to petitioners land of Ac. 3.01 Cents covered by Sy. No.29 of Pedagollapalem Village of Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, Erstwhile Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PALA KARTHI KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order:
Heard Sri Sk. Jahangeer Basha, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is against the inaction of the respondent No.4 in considering the application filed by the petitioner in Form-VI (A) under Rule 18 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1984 and the representation, dated 20.08.2025 for issuance of e-Pattadar Passbook and Title Deed in respect of the subject property over an extent of Ac.3.01 cents in Sy.No.29 of Pedagollapalem village of Sabbavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District erstwhile Visakhapatnam District.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the said application filed in accordance with law, no further proceedings have been issued by the Tahsildar in the said regard.
4. Having regard to the contentions advanced, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the Tahsildar to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, on the application filed by the petitioner, dated 20.08.2025, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the unofficial respondents.
5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 05-05-2026 MSI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27457/2025
Dated: 05-05-2026 MSI