Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2326/2026 of GOLLAPALLI ANANDA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 2326/2026 Between: 1. GOLLAPALLI ANANDA RAO, S/O G. ARJUNA, AGED ABOUT 53YRS,
APHC010035972026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2326/2026
Between:
1. GOLLAPALLI ANANDA RAO, S/O G. ARJUNA, AGED ABOUT 53YRS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.17-41/2, SANKHUCHAKRAPURAM
VILLAGE, CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-534461.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI.
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NUZVID DIVISION, ELURU
DISTRICT.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-
534461.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHITALAPUDI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT-534461.
5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, PRAGADAVARAM VILLAGE, CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-534461.
6. TALLURI DHANA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE GEORGE, AGED ABOUT
61YRS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O SANKHUCHAKRAPURAM VILLAGE, CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-534461.
7. TALLURI DHANA SANTHOSH, S/O LATE GEORGE, AGED ABOUT
31YRS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O SANKHUCHAKRAPURAM VILLAGE, CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-534461.
8. TALLURI MARIYAMMA, W/O T.SANTHOSH, AGED ABOUT 29 YRS,
OCC.
HOUSEWIFE,
R/O
SANKHUCHAKRAPURAM
VILLAGE,
CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT-534461
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent Nos.4 and 5, in collusion with Respondent Nos.6 to 8, in interfering with the civil dispute, threatening and warning the petitioner to vacate, and attempting to forcibly dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.0.08 cents in Sy.No.1141/10, situated at Pragadavaram Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District, without due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to interfere, threaten, coerce, summon or in any manner compel the petitioner to vacate the said land, and not to dispossess the petitioner except in accordance with law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondent Nos.4 and 5 not1 to interfere, not to threaten or warn the petitioner to. vacate, not to summon or coerce the petitioner, and not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.0.08 cents in Sy.No.1141/ 10, situated at Pragadavaram Village, Chintalapudi Mandal, Eluru District, pending disposal of this Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BUCHIGARI KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2326/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner is challenging the action of the police in calling him to the police station at the behest of Respondent No. 6.
2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that Respondent No. 6 lodged a complaint through the Public Grievance Redressal System (PGRS), vide Complaint No. ELR202512222052 dated 17.01.2026, alleging illegal activities on the part of the petitioner. Pursuant to the said complaint, the police called the petitioner for enquiry. However, after a thorough enquiry, the police found that there is a civil dispute between the parties; accordingly, the said PGRS complaint was closed.
3. Taking note of the written instructions of the respondent authorities, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
4. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:05.05.2026. SSA