Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/826/2009 of M.NARASINGA RAO, Vs THE STATE OF A.P., REP BY PP., AND ANOTHER, on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 826/2009 Between: 1. M.NARASINGA RAO,, S/O. MALAJI @ M.BALRAJ, RANGA REDDY
APHC010350762009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 826/2009
Between:
1. M.NARASINGA RAO,, S/O. MALAJI @ M.BALRAJ, RANGA REDDY
NAGAR, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P REP BY PP AND ANOTHER, REP BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.
2. B V RAMA RAO, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, VALLISAB ROAD, KADIRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Criminal case to this Hon'ble Court against sthe order passed in Criminal Appeal No.123 of 2007 on the file of the Judge Family Court-cum-Addl. Dist Sessions Judge, Anmantapur dt.25.05.2009
IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 1132 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, by the judgment in Crl.A.No. 123/2007 on the file of Judge, Family Court-cum-Addl. Dist Sessions Judge, Anantapur, dt.
25.05.2009
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. O MANOHER REDDY
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 826/2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The matter was posted under the heading for execution of warrant. When the authority went to execute the warrant, it was reported that the petitioner, namely M. Narasinga Rao, S/o Malaji @ Balaraj, had expired on 12.03.2012. A death certificate was also appended to the report. Having considered the report of the authority along with the death certificate, it appears that the instant Criminal Revision Case was preferred against the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the present petitioner. As the petitioner has already expired, and in view of the report, no further orders are required in this Criminal Revision Case. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:05.05.2026. SSA