Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12892/2025 of G. Venkateswarlu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 12892/2025 Between: 1. G. VENKATESWARLU,, S/O LATE AYYANNA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, HINDU,
APHC010257932025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3560]
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12892/2025
Between:
1. G. VENKATESWARLU,, S/O LATE AYYANNA, AGED ABOUT 79
YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 1-93, NIDJUR
VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
FOR
HOME
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
OFFICE
OF
THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF DEPUTY
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL TALUQA RURAL P.S., KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of Respondents particularly the personnel of the Respondent No. 4, wherein they have been continuously harassing us and calling us to the police station and insisting and threatening the Petitioners to register our properties in the name of third parties, despite pendency of Appeal Suit No. 536 of 2024 before this Hon'ble High Court as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional apart from being violative of articles 14. 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents to not interfere in our civil disputes and to not insist us to register our properties in the name of third parties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 not to harass the Petitioners herein by orally summoning them to the police station in the pretext of enquiry, without any basis; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI SARAN CHODISETTY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION No. 12892 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This instant writ petition is preferred seeking writ of mandamus upon respondent No.4, not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station.
2. Written instructions placed on record by the learned Assistant Government Pleader Home, contending inter alia that there are specific complaints by the unofficial respondent. After thorough enquiry and preliminary investigation, the police authority is of opinion that there is a civil dispute between the parties and they have closed the PGRS.No.KUR202504212223.
3. Taking note of the written instructions of the Respondent-Authority, the instant writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated: 05.05.2026 CVD