Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/412/2025 of Mogarala Prasad Vs GerikI Chalapathi on 4 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 412/2025 Between: 1. MOGARALA PRASAD, S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

APHC010062292025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 412/2025

Between:

1. MOGARALA PRASAD, S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 39

YEARS,

R/O

26-1-1577,

RAMANALAYAM

STREET.

OLD

VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE RURAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, AP.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. GERIKI CHALAPATHI, . S/O YEDUKONDALU (EXPIRED)

2. GERIKI SAI ROHITH, S/O CHALAPATHI (LATE) AGED ABOUT 32

YEARS OCCU- GOVT EMPLOYEE O/O MPDO, KOTA, KOTA

(VILLAGE,MANDAL AND POST) GUDURU DIVISION, THIRPUATHI

DISTRICT,AP.

3. GERIKL SANDHYA, D/O CHALAPATHI (LATE) AGED ABOUT 29

YEARS

OCCU-

NIL

OPPO-

TTD

KALAYANAMANDAPAM

THUMMURU VILLAGE AND POST NAIDUPETA MANDAL AND

TOWN, SULLURUPETA (DIVISION), THIRUPATHI DISTRICT, AP.

4. GERIKI DHANALAKSHMI, W/O CHALAPATHI (LATE) OPPO- TTD

KALAYANAMANDAPAM

THUMMURU

VILLAGE

AND

POST

NAIDUPETA MANDAL AND TOWN, SULLURUPETA (DIVISION), THIRUPATHI DISTRICT, AP.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of

Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by order dated 09-12-2024

pssed in IA.No.447 of 2024 in OS.No. 78 of 2014, on the file of the VII

Additional District Judge At Guddur.SPSR Nellore District IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased To Stay al, further proceedings in OS.No. 78 of 2014, on the file of the Additional District Judge At Guddur,SPSR Nellore District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V SUBHRAMANYA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. K PALLAVI

2.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/defendant aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.447 of 2024 in O.S.No.78 of 2014 by the learned VII Additional District Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District.

2. There is no representation for the petitioner.

3. It is brought to the notice of this Court by Sri B.Sampath Kumar, learned counsel representing Ms.K.Pallavi, learned counsel for respondents, that the e-Courts status shows suit was decreed with costs and hence, nothing remains for adjudication and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous.

4. The case information status is also placed on record, which indicates that the suit was decreed on 19.01.2026.

5. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 05th May, 2026

JLV

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 412/2025

Date: 05th May, 2026

JLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead