Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1608/2026 of B N RANGAIAH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1608/2026 Between: 1. B N RANGAIAH, S/O B.N.ANJINAPPA, 7-15, BOYAPETA, HINDUPUR TOWN, SRI SATYASAI DIST. 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS
APHC010023292026
IN THE H
(
TUESD
TWO T
THE HONOURAB
WRIT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B N RANGAIAH, S/O 7-15, BOYAPETA, HIN
1. THE STATE OF A REVENUE DEPAR AMARAVATI, GUNTU
2. THE COMMISSION MANGALAGIRI, GUNT
Petition under Article circumstances stated in th pleased toPleased to issue the nature of Writ of Manda in not disposing the revi Commissioner and Director the principles of the na respondent to expedite the IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section in the affidavit filed in supp Pleased to direct the 2nd HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADA T PETITION NO: 1608/2026 B.N.ANJINAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O NDUPUR TOWN, SRI SATYASAI DIST. ...PE AND AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SEC RTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELA UR DISTRICT.522237. ER AND DIRECTOR OF SETTL TUR DIST. 522503. ...RESPON 226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co e a Writ or Order or Direction more pa amus declaring the in action of the 2nd ision petition No. 16/2016 on the r of Settlements is illegal, arbitrary and atural justice and consequently direc hearing and pass 151 CPC praying that in the circumstan port of the petition, the High Court may respondent to expedite the hearing o
AM O H.NO.14- TITIONER CRETARY, AGAPUDI, LEMENTS, NDENT(S): g that in the urt may be articularly in respondent file of the violation of ct the 2nd nces stated be pleased of revision
JS,J
petition No. 16/2016 on the file of the Commissioner and Director of Settlements and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
JS,J
The Court made the following order:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred Revision Petition No.16 of 2016 before the 2nd respondent and the same is pending since more than nine (09) years and requests this Court to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the same.
3. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it appropriate to direct the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the Revision Petition No.16 of 2016 within two (02) months from the date of receipt of the order after giving an opportunity to all the parties.
4. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Dated: 05.05.2026
GRL
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1608/2026
Dated: 05.05.2026 GRL