Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14027/2025 of Viswa Sai Kuladeep Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 14027/2025 Between: 1. VISWA SAI KULADEEP, S/O LATE VISWA VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, AGED 24
APHC010278642025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3560]
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14027/2025
Between:
1. VISWA SAI KULADEEP, S/O LATE VISWA VENKATA RAMANA
MURTHY, AGED 24 YEARS,OCC GOVT.EMPLOYEE FLAT NO 501,8
TH LINE, ADITHYA NILAYAM, P N COLONY,GUJARATHIPETA
SRIKAKULAM.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT.
3. THE
SUB
DIVISIONAL
POLICE
OFFICER,
SRIKAKULAM
,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. THE
STATION
HOUSE
OFFICER,
WOMEN
POLICE
STATION,SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
5. GODDU JOSHNA, D/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED 22
YEARS,OCC GOVT. EMPLOYEE R/O PANTHULUPETA VILLAGE
/POST, AMADALAVALASA,SRIKAKULAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3 rd and 4th respondents are not to interfere into the petitioners personal life and liberty and trying to settle the personal issues between the petitioner and 5th respondent and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere into the petitioners personal life as illegal arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere into the petitioners personal life and liberty and not to summon the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M. SAPTHAGIRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION No. 14027 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This instant writ petition placed on record is filed by the petitioner, seeking necessary direction upon the authority not to harass the petitioner or to force the petitioner to settle the personal issue between unofficial respondent No.5.
2. The written instructions placed on record by the learned Assistant Government Pleader Home, contains that one complaint was lodged by the respondent No.5 with the concerned Superintendent of Police, which was forwarded to the concerned SHO. After thorough enquiry and preliminary investigation, the police authority is of opinion that the compliant has no merit and accordingly, the said compliant was closed.
3. Taking note of the written instructions of the authority, the instant writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated: 05.05.2026 CVD