Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/343/2026 of NALLAPANENI SAI HEMANTH KUMAR Vs JYESHTA HEMA NIKITHA ALIAS HEMACHOWDARY on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 343/2026 Between: 1. NALLAPANENI SAI HEMANTH KUMAR, S/O NALLAPANENI RAMESH
APHC010052312026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 343/2026
Between:
1. NALLAPANENI SAI HEMANTH KUMAR, S/O NALLAPANENI RAMESH
KUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS, OCCUPATION SELF EMPLOYED, R/O- D.NO
26-2-29,2ND
LANE,
RITHWIKENCLAVE,AK
NAGAR,
NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524004 .
...PETITIONER
AND
1. JYESHTA
HEMA
NIKITHA
ALIAS
HEMACHOWDARY,
W/O
N.SAIHEMANTH KUMAR, D/O JYESHTA AYODHYARAMU, AGED 28
YEARS,OCCUPATION ADVOCATE, R/O- D.NO 31-51-5,FLAT
NO.403,
GREEN
CITY
HEIGHTS,
PALM
STREET,
VISAKHAPATNAM(RURAL), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530049 .
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to give directions for the Expeditious disposal of F.C.O.P.No.440 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Sessions Cum Family Judge, Visakhapatnam within three months from the date of the order given by this Hon'ble Court to secure the ends of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy Case history adjournment Proceedings of
F.C.O.P.No.440 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Sessions Cum Family Judge, Visakhapatnam in the above C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. UMESH CHANDRA P V G
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
The Court made the following:
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 343 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri Umesh Chandra P.V.G, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode.
2. The Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the learned V Additional District and Sessions-cum-Family Judge, Visakhapatnam, for expeditiously disposal of F.C.O.P.No.440 of 2025 pending on its file, within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order to be passed herein.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the F.C.O.P.No.440 of 2025 was filed in the year 2023 before the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, from where, it was transferred to the Court of the learned V Additional District and Sessions-cum-Family Judge, Visakhapatnam.
4. On consideration of submissions advanced, this Court does not find any exceptional circumstances warranting a direction for expeditious disposal of the said petition, which is pending before the Court concerned since the year 2025 and appears to be of the recent year.
5. However, in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble the Apex Court in Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi V. State of Maharashtra1, referring to the 1 2024 SCC Online SC 3526
Constitution Bench judgment in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. the State of Uttar Pradesh2, in which it was observed as under: “In paragraph 47.3 of the the decision of a Constitution Bench of in the Case of 'High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh', this Court has held that in the ordinary course, the Constitutional Courts should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other Courts. Paragraph 47.3 reads thus: "47.3. Constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time- bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritizing the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending.”
6. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the same Court or to the Court of the learned Principal District Judge, for his grievance.
7. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
Dated:05.05.2026 KNN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 343 of 2026
Dated:05.05.2026 KNN