Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1593/2014 of DASARI SUBHASHINI, VIJAYAWADA & ANR Vs STATE OF A.P., REP. BY P.P., HYD on 4 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1593/2014 Between: 1. DASARI SUBHASHINI, VIJAYAWADA & ANR, W/O RANGASAI,
PHC010747742014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3560]
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1593/2014
Between:
1. DASARI SUBHASHINI, VIJAYAWADA & ANR, W/O RANGASAI, AGED
ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O AVS ROAD, PAIKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA.
2. KAVURI SOBHAN, S/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39
YEARS, R/O VIJAYAWADA.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. STATE OF A P REP BY P P HYD, through S.I. of Police Guntur Rural Police Station, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by setting aside the judgment dt.28-7-2014 passed in CrI.A.No. 238/2013 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the court of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court, Guntur in C.C.No.117 of 2008 dt.3-6-2013 in so far as offence U/Sec. 506 of I.P.C. is concerned and consequently acquit the petitioners herein; ii) and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 2564 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
dispense with filing of the certified copy of the Judgment passed in C.C.No.
117/2008 dt.30-6-2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court, Guntur, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 2612 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners herein on bail by suspending the conviction and sentence imposed in CC.No.117/2008 dated 30.06.2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.238/2013 dated 28.07.2014 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur in so far as the offence U/Sec. 506 of IPC., pending disposal of the Crl.R.C.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V SESHA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1593 OF 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The instant criminal revision case, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed by the petitioners / accused Nos.3 & 4 against the judgment dated 28.07.2014, passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur in Crl.A.No.238 of 2013, whereby the learned Sessions Judge partly allowed the judgment dated 03.06.2013, passed by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special mobile Court, Guntur, in C.C.No.117 of 2008 for the offence under Sections 120-B, 419 read with 120-B, 471 read with 120-B of IPC under each count and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each for the offence under Section 468 read with 120-B and 471 read with 120-B IPC under each count and the petitioners/Accused Nos.3 and 4 are sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three (3) months each for the offence under Section 506 IPC.
2. Mr. S. Mahesh, learned counsel representing Smt. V. Sesha Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioners frankly submits that though he tried to contact his clients. But the registered memo returned as insufficient address. Accordingly, he placed reliance upon this Court for necessary orders.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have perused the order passed by the learned trial Court.
5. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that the learned trial court has convicted and sentenced the petitioners to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three (3) months each for the offence under Section 506 IPC by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction and sentence has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the parties has also been scanned.
6. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the trial Court has specifically decided the grounds of petition as mentioned by the petitioners, they have also decided on the point for determination. The learned Appellate Court has also rightly decided the matter and partly allowed the order of the learned trial Court. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.
7. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial Court as well as the learned Appellate Court.
8. Under the above observation, the instant criminal revision case is dismissed as devoid of merit. Let a copy of this order be served upon the learned trial court for ready reference. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 05.05.2026 CVD