Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32754/2025 of E.Satish Kumar, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 3 May 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 32754 OF 2025 Between: 1. E.SATISH KUMAR,, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGE 41 YEARS, OCC
APHC010628892025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 32754 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. E.SATISH KUMAR,, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGE 41 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, KONDURU VILLAGE, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT.
2. E.NARESH KUMAR,, S/O ADINARAYANAPPA, AGE 39 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, KONDURU VILLAGE, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PUTTAPARTHY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
3. THE TAHASILDAR, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, CHILAMATHUR, CHILAMATHUR MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Sreemannarayana Vattikuti, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Kotharu Vijayeswari, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioners is against the inaction on the part of the respondents in correcting and updating the revenue records relating to the lands over an extent of Ac.9.67 in Sy.Nos.324-2A1, 324-2A2, 296-4A, 296-4B, 296-4C, 296-4D and 296-4E in Konduru Village, Lepakshi Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, by deleting the erroneous entry “Assigned Land made Freehold” in Column No.6 of the online Adangal/1B and consequently sought for a direction to make a necessary entry in the patta land in accordance with the report dated 17.10.2025 of the 3rd respondent.
3. The 3rd respondent-Tahsildar filed a counter-affidavit. Paragraph No. 12 of the said counter-affidavit reads as follows: “12. In reply to Para No.8 of the affidavit, it is submitted that the petitioner’s subject land extents inSy.Nos.324 Ac.19.40 and Sy.No.296-4 extent Ac.3.59 of Kondurvillage of Lepakshi Mandal were kept in free hold by mistake due to submission of report by the then 3rd respondent and there is no willful violation of statutory instructions. The ownership, possession and right of the petitioners is not disturbed by the respondents. The allegations putforth by the petitioner against the respondents is not tenable.”
4. In view of the submissions made by the Tahsildar, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2
and 3 to make necessary corrections in Column No.6 of the online Adangal/1B by deleting the erroneous entry “Assigned Land made Freehold” and substitute the same with “patta land” in the names of the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 04.05.2026 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 32754 OF 2025
Date: 04.05.2026 BSK