Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10637/2026 of Sirigineedi Subba Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 3 May 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 10637/2026 Between: 1. SIRIGINEEDI SUBBA RAO, S/O RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED 40
APHC010177312026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 10637/2026
Between:
1. SIRIGINEEDI SUBBA RAO, S/O RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, CURRENTLY WORKING AS DEPUTY
TAHSILDAR,
EAST
GODAVARI,
R/O
D.NO.3-140,
KESANAPSALLI, NAGANNAGARIPALEM, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-533244
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY
ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY (REVENUE DEPT.), AP
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDIAMARAVATI
ANDHRA PRADESH- 522238
2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, (CCLA) GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 1 AND 3
FLOORS APIIC BUILDING, AUTO NAGAR NEAR NRI
HOSPITALS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ,
Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents in considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Tahsildar Zone-11, on the sole ground of pendency of departmental enquiry pursuant to Charge Memo vide G.O. Rt. No. 583 Revenue (Vigilance-Ill) Department dated 16.06.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the guidelines issued in G.O. Ms. No. 257
General Administration (SER.C) Department dated 10.06.1999, and consequently direct the Respondents to consider and promote the Petitioner to the post of Tahsildar Zone-11 in accordance with his seniority and eligibility, without reference to the impugned Charge Memo and pending enquiry and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT Respondent No.2 to consider the Representation dated 03.04.2026 made by the petitioner as per G.O. Ms. No. 257 dated 10.06.1999 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition or to pas Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K ANJANA RAMA KAMESWARI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar Zone-II on the sole ground of pendency of departmental enquiry pursuant to charge memo vide G.O.Rt.No.583 Revenue (Vigilance-III) Department dated 16.06.2025 as illegal and arbitrary in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration Department dated 10.06.1999.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
3. A charge memo videG.O.Rt.No.583 Revenue (Vigilance-III) Department dated 16.06.2025 was issued to the petitioner framing charges. The petitioner submitted a written explanation on 12.08.2025 urging the authorities to consider his case for promotion in view of G.O.Ms.No.257 dated 10.06.1999 taking into consideration the initiation of enquiry and the timing of issuance of the charge memo which was issued right before promotions and the same has not been considered.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the respondents have not considered the case of the petitioner for promotion, despite his seniority and clean service record.
5. Having heard the respective submissions, this Court is of the opinion that the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post ofTahsildar Zone-IIcan be considered in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, dated 10.06.1999.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case for promotion to the post of Tahsildar Zone-IIsubject to the petitioner possessing requisite qualifications in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999and also conclude the enquiry, if any pending, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.91, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 12.09.2022. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:04.05.2026 sj
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO:10637of 2026
Dated:04.05.2026
sj