WP/12697/2025 of Smt Tiyyabandi Lalitha, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 3 May 2026

1. SMT TIYYABANDI LALITHA,, W/O TIYYABANDI BALASUBRAMANYAM, OCC. PROPRIETOR OF THE SRI MAHA LAKSHMI RICE MILL, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O BRAHMANA KRAKA, JALADANKI, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524223.

2. SRI TIYYABANDI BALASUBRAMANYAM,, S/O TIYYABANDI SUBBARAIDU, AGED 44 YEARS R/O BRAHMANA KRAKA, JALADANKI, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524223

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE DISTRICT.

4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT.

5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT.

6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAVALI POLICE STATION, NELLORE DISTRICT.

7. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BAPATLA POLICE STATION,

SS, J W.P.No.12697 of 2025

BAPATLA DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 calling us to the, police stations and interfering in my peaceful life as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority of law and jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.6 and 7 not to summon us to the Police Stations or not interfere with our personal liberty IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to harass us by calling us to the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 Police Stations Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

SS, J W.P.No.12697 of 2025

The Court made the following Order:

The instant Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus against respondents 6 & 7 alleging that the petitioner was illegally and arbitrarily harassed by the Police by calling him to the Police Station.

2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits written instructions, contending inter alia that on the basis of a written complaint of one Sri P. Yesayya, a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Police and in connection with the said preliminary enquiry, the petitioner was called upon to the Police Station. It is submitted by the respondent authorities that now the preliminary enquiry has ended, which revealed that there are business disputes between the petitioner and Sri P. Yesayya. Accordingly, the petitioner was not illegally harassed by the respondent authorities.

3. Considering the submission in the written instructions, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J

04.05.2026

MJA

SS, J

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

WRIT PETITION NO: 12697/2025

04.05.2026

MJA